24, 2007 at 04:53:21PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Ed S Peschko writes:
>
> Ed> which would be fine if the AIX linker works, but I'm getting segmentation
> Ed> faults when compiling perl out of the box, using the gcc-4.1.0 compiler
> Ed> pro
All,
I was wondering - what's the current status of the gcc compiler chain on
AIX?
I need to build a bunch of open source tools on AIX, but I see from
the following site:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-gnu.html
'You cannot use the GNU linker on AIX as this w
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:35:39PM -0800, Brooks Moses wrote:
> Ed S. Peschko wrote:
> >And in any case, why should it be off-topic? I would think that
> >the possibility of your project being divided in two would be of
> >great concern to you guys, and that you'd have
> > I'm sorry, but IMO this GPL change seems just a disaster waiting to
> > happen. Unless GPL3 is non-controversial (which it sounds like it is
> > not) it'll tear both your development team and your user community
> > in half, as well as probably get rid of a large part of your
> > corporate fund
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:14:00PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > So, again, Is gcc planning on automatically moving to gpl version 3, staying
> > at gpl version 2, or having a protracted discussion? What happens if some
> > developers decide they want to stay at 2 and others deci
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:14:00PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > So, again, Is gcc planning on automatically moving to gpl version 3,
> > staying
> > at gpl version 2, or having a protracted discussion? What happens if some
> > developers decide they want to stay at 2 and oth
All,
I'm curious what is to happen with gcc when the gpl version 3 is done.
Will new versions of gcc be automatically changed to use the new license,
or will gcc stay at 2, will there be discussion about any such change?
My concern - and I'm sure I'm not the only one so concerned - is that
if gc
