On Nov 28, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28 November 2012 09:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 28 November 2012 07:36, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> What you described is the 'transitional model' right? but I don't see
>>> any of those in the C++ standard working paper:
>>> http://
When bootstrapping a mainline compiler on i386-apple-darwin8.8.1, we
are linking libstdc++.dylib incorrectly. My understanding of the
build machinery behind libstdc++ is very poor, so here's what I've
found.
The symptom of the problem is a warning from the Darwin linker when
trying to bui
I just read Nathan's discussion [1] on changing GCC's type system to
use canonical type nodes, where the comparison between two types
requires only a pointer comparison. Right now, we use "comptypes",
which typically needs to do deep structural checks to determine if
two types are equivalen
Running "make check-g++" for GCC 4.0.0 fails any tests that need to
link on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0, with error messages such as:
/usr/bin/ld: warning suggest use of -bind_at_load, as lazy binding may
result in
errors or different symbols being used
symbol _tanl used from dynamic library
est should not have been passing in the first place.
Okay for mainline?
Doug Gregor
2005-05-28 Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/2922
* semantics.c (perform_koenig_lookup): For dependent calls, just
return the set of functions we've found so far. Later, it will be
aug
