H. J. Lu wrote:
We are working on complete data of SPEC CPU 2K/2006 on Core 2 Duo.
It will take about a week.
There are results' comparison I got for gcc 4.2 revisions 117890,
117891 and 121952 on SPEC CPU2K/2006
SPEC CPU2000:
117891 vs 117890 121952 vs 117890
164.gzip
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:20 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:
Should
+static int reg_inc_found_and_valid_p (unsigned int, unsigned int, rtx);
be removed if we do this way?
Yes, in fact it does not need to be there in the first place as
the function is declared before the use.
-- Pin
Andrew Pinski wrote:
What about defining the code this way:
#ifdef AUTO_INC_DEC
+ static int
+ reg_inc_found_and_valid_p (unsigned int regno,
+unsigned int endregno,
+rtx insn)
+ {
...
}
#else
#define reg_inc_found_and_valid_p(regno,endre
{
! if (regno_clobbered_p (regno, insn, rld[r].mode, 2))
switch (rld[r].when_needed)
{
case RELOAD_FOR_OTHER_ADDRESS:
2006-02-16 Denis Nagorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-optimization/25603
*
n you comment new patch version.
It isn't fully tested but am I going in right direction?
2006-02-13 Denis Nagorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-optimization/25603
* reload.c (reg_inc_found_and_valid_p): New. Check REG_INC note.
(regno_clobbered_p): Use it. Reusi
