>>> cat e
#!/bin/sh
#
#
root -l -b <
int main(void)
{
puts("Hello, world, you can ignore all that particle physics if you like.");
printf("By the way, log(2025) is %lf\n",log(2025.));
printf("Here I have suppressed the banner\n");
return 0;
}
DOIT
>>> ./e
Hello, world, you can ignore al
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 2:48 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> [...]
>
>
> Still it would be a nice touch if we could do
>
> #!/usr/bin/gcc -f
> #include
> int main()
> {
> puts("Hello, world");
> return 0;
> }
>
re previously mentioned "root"
>>> cat d
#include
int main(void)
{
puts("Hello, wo
Does "root" do what you want?
https://root.cern/
https://root.cern/primer/#learn-c-at-the-root-prompt
Includes a c++ interpreter (which includes all of C) that interprets C as
you go, then at your option, compile a just-interpreted function,
dynamically link it, and use the compiled version of that
We have many STDs.
stdio
stdlib
libstdc++
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:57 AM Dwayne Jacobs <
d.jac...@backgroundchecksmailing.org> wrote:
> Hi GCC Team,
>
> I wanted to follow up once more regarding the latest STD statistics in the
> US.
>
> As I mentioned previously, I believe the data could be a u
and PowerPC which
will show why Intel can display the size of the variable but PowerPC
can not. Thanks for you help.
Carl Love
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 5:13 AM, 夏晗 wrote:
> root@Xia-Ubuntu:/usr/bin# gcc -v
> 使用内建 specs。
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> 目标：x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> 配置为：../configure -enable-checking=release -enable-languages=c,c++
> -disable-multilib
> 线程模型：posix
> gcc 版本 6.2.0 (GCC)
> I have tried many methods like 'ln' and
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Roman Popov wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to switch from g++ 5.4 to g++ 7.2.
> GDB 8.0.1 however does not understand RTTI generated by g++7.2, so my
> Python scripts for GDB are not working.
>
> Here is a code example:
>
> struct base { virtual ~base(){} };
>
> te
line 12 , you say "void A( );"
say instead:
void A(){};
That solved it for me, using gcc7.2
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 4:56 PM, chengjian (D) wrote:
> I have written a simple code like this
>
> ```c
> #include
> #include
>
> //#define CONFIG_TARGET_X86_64
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_X86_64
> static
toolchain problems? If you really want to learn , try
linuxfromscratch.org
and
http://trac.clfs.org/
Cross linux from scratch
You complained about too much documentation, and here's some more.
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 18:17 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our build recipe:
>>
>> %define mpfr_version 2.4.2
>> %define mpc_version0.8.1
>> %define gmp_version4.3.2
>
> Best thing to do is look at the co
suggested additions:
get and insert the latest libtool, which includes files:
libtool.m4 ltgcc.m4 lt~obsolete.m4 ltoptions.m4 ltsugar.m4 ltversion.m4,
all way-old currently in gcc-7
get latest autoconf. 2.64 in use, latest is 2.69
get latest texinfo.tex, not one 5 years old
GNU is supposed
在 12/15/15 11:09, Andrew Pinski 写道:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Carl Lei wrote:
Hello list,
The following code is rejected by GCC but accepted by Clang:
template
auto f(T v) -> decltype(g(v));
int g(int) { return 0; }
template
auto f(T v) -> decltype(g(v))
{
return g(
am not very sure about the wording. I suspect this to be a
GCC bug, but not sure, so asking here first.
--
Carl Lei (XeCycle)
Department of Physics and Astronomy, SJTU
gcc -S tmp.S for some reason prints to stdout, so gcc -S tmp.S > tmp.s
is what you need
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Carl wrote:
> you could run cpp on it by itself, or I suspect gcc -S tmp.s will also
> work, im in a rush though cant test this.
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9
but this does
> assembling as well - so I'd have to filter the real assembler from there, and
> try this way.
>
> Is there something easier?
>
>
> Thank you for all answers.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil
>
> --
> Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation?
> Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)!
>
--
Carl
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Farlie A wrote:
> In terms of Visual Basic code, there is of course no 'free' compiler for VB
> code written prior
> to VB.NET., and again the EULA for the runtime support would prevent use of
> the Vendor's
> runtime on 'free' systems..
> Should there be a way of
Hi, Im sorry that this is not 100% specific to gcc, however this
mailing list is the last place where I think this knowledge may lie. I
have written some image processing routines in assembly language
making extensive use of MMX, and now I want to start optimizing it,
however I cant for the life of
I need a way to extract from gcc, each time gcc runs, the following information:
A) When a call to any function F is encountered, I require the full path of the
file wherein F is defined.
B) When the conversion of any pointer of type STRICT->funcptr (structure
member of type pointer to function(
On 8/4/05, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you using an x86 host and an arm target?
>
Actually no, my major concern at the time was the large quantity of
legacy code with packed structures that we have on an embedded linux
x86 system. I was just testing that we didn't have an issue
th: ../gcc-3.4.3/configure --prefix=/opt/tools/3.4.3-elf
--target=arm-elf --with-float=soft --with-arch=armv5te
--enable-cxx-flags=-march=armv5te --enable-languages=c,c++ : (reconfigured)
../gcc-3.4.3/configure --prefix=/opt/tools/3.4.3-elf --target=arm-elf
--with-float=soft --enable-languages=c,c++
20 matches
Mail list logo
