On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 11:24, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 03:12, Chris Punches via Gcc
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been reading quietly on how the GCC SC handles this and generally
>> only lurk here so that I can stay informed on
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 03:12, Chris Punches via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been reading quietly on how the GCC SC handles this and generally
> only lurk here so that I can stay informed on GCC changes. I am nobody
> you would probably care about, but, maybe I will be one day. No one
> ever re
Hello there
As a long time GCC user, who is also a father to teenage children, I would
very much prefer if a person who openly expressed opinions, and also openly
exercised behaviours, which I consider abhorrent, was *not* associated with
the GCC project. It does not matter to me what kind of cont
On 03/12/2012 03:09, Kenny Simpson wrote:
From http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html, I see that this seems to
be the only major core-language feature missing from c++11 support.
And from http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html I see that clang does
support it.
I see the note saying that it was b
On 02/12/2011 12:11, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 12/02/2011 11:17 AM, Hans Aberg wrote:
[I am not on this list, so please cc me.]
On the link below it says that Bronek Kozicki has been working on C++
rvalue references for *this. What is the progress of this feature?
Let's ask him, seem
