Xtensa port maintainer

I am moving to a new job and will no longer be able to serve as the Xtensa port maintainer for GCC. I would like to nominate Sterling Augustine to take my place. Sterling has done a lot of work on the GNU assembler and recently worked on GCC with me to use DWARF unwinding for Xtensa. I think

Re: GCC targets need updating for new register allocator

Joseph S. Myers wrote: The new Integrated Register Allocator is now in GCC trunk, and the old allocator is scheduled for removal on or shortly after 25 September. All GCC targets need updating for the new allocator; targets that have not been updated when the old allocator is removed will no l

Re: GCC 4.2 Branch Status: Slush

Mark Mitchell wrote: When I sent out the notice about GCC 4.2.2 RC1, I failed to note the GCC 4.2 branch should now be considered slushy; please get my explicit approval before check-in. Obviously, there was no way anyone could have known that, so if things have been checked in since the announc

RFA: (dataflow?) testsuite regression since last week

I'm still seeing two testsuite regressions for Xtensa compared to last Friday: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-6.c gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c Both tests fail at -O3 with "internal compiler error: in get_biv_step, at loop-iv.c:792". Neither the Xtensa port nor the loop-iv.c code has changed s

Re: POINTER_PLUS branch status?

Andrew Pinski wrote: I cleaned up the code today so it basically ready to be merged, some (most?) of the target headers still need to be fixed for the change. The list of targets which need to be changed is: alpha ia64 mips pa s390sparcstormy16xtensa I don't have acc

Re: Register windows implementation in Xtensa backend

"kernel coder" wrote: > I'm trying to understand the register windows > implementation in xtensa backend.I could not find much theory about > register windows in extensa.I am trying to understand the register > windows implementation by observing the assembly file generated by gcc > f

Re: GCC 4.0.3 RC1

Looks OK for xtensa-elf: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-03/msg00356.html --Bob

Re: GCC 4.1.0 RC1

I ran the testsuite for an xtensa-elf target and it looks OK: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01243.html There are a few failures but they are not regressions. --Bob

Re: For those who want to automatically generate predicates.md...

Kazu Hirata wrote: I created a set of scripts that generates predicates.md based on PREDICATE_CODES in tm.h. Thank you! I had been planning to do this for the Xtensa port, but your scripts motivated me to do it sooner. I ended up rewriting most of the predicates in Lisp-style, but the scripts w

Re: help regarding suif

Vivek, GCC and the GNU project have nothing to do with SUIF. If you want to ask questions about SUIF, you should do so on a more appropriate mailing list. I suggest you look here: http://www-suif.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/suif-talk/ Good luck. --Bob