Bruce Korb wrote:
> Philip Martin wrote:
> >The capital 'I' in 'Is' looks wrong.
> ...
> That's what I wanted: a nice, simple answer that was short of re-pulling
> the entire repository. ``delete the entire ada sub-dir from the
> working copy and update will download it again.'' Thank you!
> (I
Mark Cuss wrote:
> I'm pretty certain that I'm not the only person who struggles with the "Oh,
> that app was built on RH 8 so it won't run on RH 7.3" problems, so I'm
> trying to find a solution where I can configure my build system in such a
> way that I can distribute a set of libraries with
Bernard Leak wrote:
> Firstly, thanks to Bob Proulx for the helpful pointer to the Debian
> search widget. This is a genuinely useful-looking tool. How pleasing!
Not wanting to take credit inappropriately, it was Zack who suggested
the Debian package search page. I was the mailx histor
Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Bernard Leak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Fine - but then it tells me (actually, the docs said this already)
> > that I need "the Mail program" in my path. Not wanting to be
> > obstructive or anything, but ... wot?
>
> This program should have been included with your op
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't think fsh is a good idea. That could mean potentially hundreds
> of persistent ssh connections sitting around on the server.
There would at most be one per user making commits to the depot. Do
you really have hundreds of people making commits? You probably ha
Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I should note that svn treats it's remote connections as disposable, so
> svn+ssh will probably connect more than once for things like remote
> diffs. So if it takes a while to authenticate, this may not be your
> best bet if you are looking for blazing speed (as some seem t
