>
>
>
> > I think the key difference here is that Autotools allows arbitrarily
> generated code to be executed at any time. More modern build systems
> require the use of specific commands/files to run arbitrary code, e.g.
> CMake (IIRC [`execute_process()`][2] and [`ExternalProject`][3]), Meson
>
>
> > Of computer science graduates I have encountered over the last decade, I
> > know few who started their journey with gcc and they were all in the
> > initial part of the decade. In recent years I don't think I encountered
> > any student who works on gcc; many even start with the assumption
ation)
> - Geophysical Simulation
> - Geological Subsurface Mapping
> - Disaster Preparedness and Mitigation
> - Natural Resource Exploration and Production
> - Free Software Advocacy
>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 31, 2021 at 9:55 AM
> *From:* "Andrew Sutton&qu
> Am I totally on the wrong track here?
That depends on what you want your assumptions to do. This definitely
doesn't solve the problems I'm having implementing C++ contracts,
especially axioms, which can involve declarations of undecidable
functions. For example, is_reachable(p, q) for a pair of
> I'm trying to figure out how to bring variables into scope
> temporarily. The issue we're having is parsing something like:
>
> auto f1(auto x) requires MyConcept() { }
>
> This is similar to the late return type code, but we want to parse
> this during cp_parser_init_declarator instead of durin
ience.
I'll send over the mentor request.
Andrew
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov
wrote:
> On Saturday, March 1, 2014, Andrew Sutton wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is the right place to post, but I had a question
>> regard
co-mentor for one or both.
I asked Jason Merrill off list and he indicated that this would be a
good idea. I wanted to float the idea with the GSoC admin/co-admin
before sending a "make me a mentor request".
Thoughts?
Andrew Sutton
> .. right now I can't really check, but looks like 54912 & co
Hmm... is anybody actively working on this? It's breaking a lot of my
code. I'd take a stab at fixing this, but not for the next couple of
weeks.
Andrew
>> I just updated to GCC from trunk (r192711) and started getting some
>> peculiar errors. In particular, GCC seems to believe that sizeof(T) is
>> no longer a constant when used as an argument to an alias template.
>
> I think Jakub just fixed that one an hour ago or so.
And committed the changes
ot; works fine. It looks like this problem may have been
introduced during a change to instantiate template aliases inside
template definitions, because I wasn't getting this behavior in my
previous version (~1 month old? 2?).
Andrew Sutton
andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
