> Roughly speaking, when number() is invoked, the object still has type
> Base (with a corresponding vtable). One's constructor will change the
> type once the Base part has been constructed.
Aha yes, I didn't even think of that! Thanks Florian and Lion for your
helpful answers!
> The following
Hi all,
I was expecting the following code snippet to work, so am I doing
something wrong, or is there an issue with GCC? I was under the
impression that this is allowed, according to
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/strange-inheritance.html#faq-23.1
It seems like GCC initially allows it as
