Re: [RFC][i*86]appropriate target triplet for Android on x86?

That's a very good suggestion. Thanks. -Doug 2010/3/19 Joseph S. Myers : > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Doug Kwan (Ãö®¶¼w) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>     I would like to get some advice on handling Android for x86 in >> tool configurations.  Android is based on Linux but it is exactly the >> same, so some cu

[RFC][i*86]appropriate target triplet for Android on x86?

Hi, I would like to get some advice on handling Android for x86 in tool configurations. Android is based on Linux but it is exactly the same, so some customizations are required. There was a discussion among people working on Android and someone suggested using i*86-unknown-android. My ques

Documentation on running dejagnu with qemu?

I would like to run the testsuite using qemu as the gdb simulator does not support newer ARMs. However, there does not seems to be any good documents on that topic. Could someone give me a pointer or two? Thanks. -Doug

Re: [ARM] Why MI thunks are always implemented in ARM code?

2008/5/23 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Recent gcc is capable of generating pure Thumb thunks (and always does so for > Thumb-2). I noticed that in top-of-trunk but I am working thumb, not thumb2. > Thumb branches have extremely limited range, and you can't clobber any low > registers. A co

[ARM] Why MI thunks are always implemented in ARM code?

I saw that MI thunks are always issued in ARM mode. Is there a specific reason? I browse the EABI and its supplement and there is no mentioning of how thunks are implemented. I think I can replace a 20-byte ARM MI thunk with a 4 bytes THUMB equivalent when the thunkee is also in THUMB mode. Is th

Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen

Done. Fix commited to 133690. I am using the gcc 4.0.3 configure for i486-linux-gnu. -Doug 2008/3/28 Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 13:30, Doug Kwan (關振德) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I got a new breakage after updating to rev 133687 5 minut

Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen

I got a new breakage after updating to rev 133687 5 minutes ago. :-( gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -Werror -Wno-return-type -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../

Re: C++ FE question: When is CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES valid?

Thanks Mark. I am using classes after they are defined. So it should be okay for me. -Doug 2008/3/19 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote: > > > I have a question about the validity of CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES. > > Due to templates, it i

C++ FE question: When is CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES valid?

Hi, I have a question about the validity of CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES. Due to templates, it is not possible to know if a class has virtual bases or not until the class is fully instantiated. Is checking processing_template_decl sufficient to guarantee that CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES is valid? Thank

Re: Adding new dwarf encoding formats for complex integers

2:30:36PM -0800, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote: > > Is there anything I need to do in addition to changing gcc? Are > > there people I should talk to? And what documentation should be > > updated? Currently gdb (I checked 6.7) does not support complex > > integer properly. So it ne

Adding new dwarf encoding formats for complex integers

Hi, I am working on the gcc LTO project and I found that gcc does not generate sufficient debugging information for complex integer types. Currently gcc uses encoding DW_ATE_lo_user ( 0x80) for complex integer types but that 1) clashes with an HP extension and 2) does not distinguish between c