Re: how to modify gcc to compile a[b] differently

2015-04-01 12:19 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener : > You probably want to do this in the frontends. And one of them is C++ :-)

GCC 4.9 internal compiler error

Hi all! It was found that OA fails to build with GCC 4.9 on amd64 [1] I can confirm this with r3094 on bare metal too. # gcc --version gcc-4.9.real (Debian 4.9.1-14) 4.9.1 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO

Re: Rename unwind.h to unwind-gcc.h

AFAIK GCC's unwind.h installed into GCC's private directory, e. g. /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-solaris2.11/4.8/include/unwind.h Is there any real problem?

Re: Why aren't installed binaries stripped?

2013/10/30 FX : > OK, great. Any reason why it should not be the “default” install? Then we need "make install-nostrip" ;-)

Re: put ELF reloc section against section with template function instantiation in the same COMDAT group

2013/7/8 Andrew Pinski : > I think GCC's behavior is depend on the assembler which is being used. > So if you used Sun's assembler it would have placed it in the same > COMDAT group. Meaning this is really a GNU binutils issue rather than > a GCC one. Thank you. I believe GCC on Solaris is usin

put ELF reloc section against section with template function instantiation in the same COMDAT group

Hi, all. First off, I know that I'm posting to GCC list :-) And I'm looking for competent opinions. I'm working on CLang/LLVM issue [1]. Clang doesn't put section with relocation entries against section with templated function instantiation in the same COMDAT group. AFAIK GCC does not do it too,