Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

David Edelsohn via Gcc writes: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:23 PM Richard Sandiford > wrote: > >> David Edelsohn writes: >> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:22 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc < >> gcc@gcc.gnu.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to b

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:23 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > David Edelsohn writes: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:22 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc < > gcc@gcc.gnu.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the > >> Steering Committee.

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

David Edelsohn writes: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:22 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the >> Steering Committee. I wonder if we could add a second, more >> community-based >> route: someone can be appointed

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:22 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the > Steering Committee. I wonder if we could add a second, more > community-based > route: someone can be appointed as a reviewer or maintainer with th

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

> Am 03.06.2025 um 12:22 schrieb Richard Sandiford via Gcc : > > Hi, > > At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the > Steering Committee. I wonder if we could add a second, more community-based > route: someone can be appointed as a reviewer or maintainer with t

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 at 11:21, Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the > Steering Committee. I wonder if we could add a second, more community-based > route: someone can be appointed as a reviewer or maintainer with the a

An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

Hi, At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the Steering Committee. I wonder if we could add a second, more community-based route: someone can be appointed as a reviewer or maintainer with the agreement of a given number of people who already have an equal or greater