On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:44 AM Robin Dapp wrote:
> > You won't see failures in the testsuite. The failures only show-up when I
> > attempt to impose huge costs on NF above threshold. A quick & dirty way
> to
> > expose the bug is apply the appended patch, then observe that you get
> output
> > f
Hello,
we are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting.
On Mon, Mar 24 2025, Yuao Ma via Gcc wrote:
> Hello GCC Community,
>
> My name is Yuao, and I’m excited to express my interest in the
> “Fortran – 2018/202x” project for Google Summer of Code. I am majoring in
> Cyber
> Science a
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc writes:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 07:21:32AM +0300, Eldar Kusdavletov via Gcc wrote:
>> *Dear GCC Mentoring Team,*
>> I am writing to submit my proposal for the Google Summer of Code (GSoC)
>> 2025 program, aiming to contribute to the GCC project by implementing a
>> feature
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 07:21:32AM +0300, Eldar Kusdavletov via Gcc wrote:
> *Dear GCC Mentoring Team,*
> I am writing to submit my proposal for the Google Summer of Code (GSoC)
> 2025 program, aiming to contribute to the GCC project by implementing a
> feature similar to Clang's -ftime-trace. This
Gwen Fu 于 2025年3月25日周二 下午8:34写道：
> I found out that "-fcheck=*" is an option for runtime checking, but the
> relevant options are commented out.
> OPT_fcheck_ = 1070,/* -fcheck= */
> /* OPT_fcheck_assert = 1071, *//* -fcheck=assert */
> /* OPT_fcheck_boun
You won't see failures in the testsuite. The failures only show-up when I
attempt to impose huge costs on NF above threshold. A quick & dirty way to
expose the bug is apply the appended patch, then observe that you get output
from this only for mask_struct_store-*.c and not for mask_struct_load-*.
