Hello everyone,
I am pleased that I can announce that we have been accepted to be a GSoC
mentoring organization also in 2025!.
This also means that students are now really starting to look at our
idea page and so if anyone wants to add a project, it is still possible
but we should not delay it mu
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 23:53 vspefs wrote:
> By the way, what's stop us from having compiler options like
> `g++ -Rgcm.cache -Rsomewhere/else/gcm.cache` to specify CMI repo path,
> like `-I`
> for include paths? It could be useful for projects with complex folder
> structure, as build tools like
On Tuesday, March 4th, 2025 at 18:04, Ben Boeckel via Gcc
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:53:51 +, vspefs wrote:
>
> > By the way, what's stop us from having compiler options like
> > `g++ -Rgcm.cache -Rsomewhere/else/gcm.cache` to specify CMI repo path, like
> > `-I`
> > for include p
> But I have a new emulator called mfemul.c, and it
> isn't very mature and almost certainly has a bug in
> it that is affecting gcc 3.2.3. And since that is the only
> Any suggestions on where to stick some printfs so that
> I can start looking for a divergence, given that the
> generated code is
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:53:51 +, vspefs wrote:
> By the way, what's stop us from having compiler options like
> `g++ -Rgcm.cache -Rsomewhere/else/gcm.cache` to specify CMI repo path, like
> `-I`
> for include paths? It could be useful for projects with complex folder
> structure, as build t
