On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 03:53:34PM +, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> The attached patch adds a new bitfield needs_max_vf_lowering to loop, and
> sets that in expand_omp_simd for loops that need delayed lowering of
> safelen and omp simd arrays. The patch defines a new macro
> OMP_COMMON_MAX_VF (
Hi Carlos,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:52:13PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > We discussed this with OpenSSF and submitted a funding request to
> > OpenSSF Alpha Omega for this particular part. OpenSSF initially was
> > supportive to funding these kinds of security plans, but they have been
> >
On 02/11/2024 00:55, Oren Zvi via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Was wondering about a curious thing that the compiler does.
> For the code
>
> static void createX()
> {
> static char ;
> static uint8_t y;
>
> printf("%c %c\r\n", y, );
> }
>
> I am getting the following lines in the m
[...skip literally unreadable deeply nested conversation...]
A couple of years ago I posted a patch to this same code solving a
performance problem with x86_64/amdgcn offloading:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/0e1a740e-46d5-ebfa-36f4-9a069ddf8...@codesourcery.com/
At that t
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Sent: 29 October 2024 16:46
> > To: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Cc: Richard Biener ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thomas
> > Schwinge ; Jakub Jelinek
> > Subject: Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offload
