Dear Martin and GCC Community,
Thank you for clarifying the GSoC requirements for GCC. While I initially
hoped to work on the GCC webpages, I am still very eager to
participate in *GSoC
2025 with GCC* and contribute to the project in a meaningful way. I would
be happy to pivot my focus to areas th
Sent from my iPhone gf fy
Snapshot gcc-13-20241025 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/13-20241025/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 13 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Hello Monika,
On Fri, Oct 25 2024, Nainika Reddy Vempalli via Gcc wrote:
> Dear GCC Community,
>
> My name is Nainika Reddy Vempalli and I'm currently a second year
> Computer Science Student with a background in C/C++. I am interested in
> participating in *Google Summer Of Code 2025* wit
Dear GCC Community,
My name is Nainika Reddy Vempalli and I'm currently a second year
Computer Science Student with a background in C/C++. I am interested in
participating in *Google Summer Of Code 2025* with *GNU Compiler
Organisation* focusing mainly on improving the GCC webpages.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 9:48 PM David Brown via Gcc wrote:
>
> On 24/10/2024 16:35, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 15:00, Mateusz Guzik via Gcc wrote:
> >
> >> I understand the stock behavior of pilling variables on may happen to
> >> improve cache usage.
> >>
> >> Howe
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 16:29, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 03:22 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > As an experiment Sourceware is now running an forgejo v9 instance at
> > https://forge.sourceware.org
> >
> > Everybody with an @sourceware.org, @cygwin.com or @gcc.gnu.org
> > address
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 16:06, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 4:35 PM Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >> For illustrative purposes, I don't care about the name:
> >> -align-object-data-section=64
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Wouldn't that be a linker option, and so not part of GCC?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 4:35 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> For illustrative purposes, I don't care about the name:
>> -align-object-data-section=64
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>
> Wouldn't that be a linker option, and so not part of GCC?
>
Indeed it would be, I assumed this is the right list to prod though.
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 15:00, Mateusz Guzik via Gcc wrote:
> I understand the stock behavior of pilling variables on may happen to
> improve cache usage.
>
> However, in a multicore setting it is a never-ending source of
> unintentionally showing up and disappearing false-sharing depending on
> u
On 24/10/2024 16:29, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 03:22 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> As an experiment Sourceware is now running an forgejo v9 instance at
>> https://forge.sourceware.org
>>
>> Everybody with an @sourceware.org, @cygwin.com or @gcc.gnu.org
>> address
>> can register
I understand the stock behavior of pilling variables on may happen to
improve cache usage.
However, in a multicore setting it is a never-ending source of
unintentionally showing up and disappearing false-sharing depending on
unrelated variables being added or removed.
I'm aware one can manually a
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 1:25 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 6:26 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >
> > As an experiment Sourceware is now running an forgejo v9 instance at
> > https://forge.sourceware.org
> >
> > Everybody with an @sourceware.org, @cygwin.com or @gcc.gnu.org addres
13 matches
Mail list logo
