Pedantically, I should say valid, not unique.
More pedantically, it should be distinct from any other pointer
returned by malloc or realloc and not freed or realloced since.
Doug
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:09 PM Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> CC += JeanHeyd
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:25:55PM
CC += JeanHeyd
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:25:55PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:19:07PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > CC += Robert, Joseph, gcc@
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:30:27PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:23:29PM GMT,
> Pedantically, I should say valid, not unique.
More pedantically, it should be distinct from any other pointer returned by
malloc or realloc and not freed or realloced since.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:25 AM Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:19:07PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar w
Ramana Radhakrishnan via Gcc writes:
> I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed
> Alex Coplan as a maintainer for the AArch64 load / store pair fusion
> pass.
>
> In addition the steering committee has also appointed him as
> maintainer for the Pair Fusion pass in the
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:19:07PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> CC += Robert, Joseph, gcc@
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:30:27PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:23:29PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > CC += Doug, as the author of the original malloc(3).
> > >
CC += Robert, Joseph, gcc@
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:30:27PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:23:29PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > CC += Doug, as the author of the original malloc(3).
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:21:22PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > Hi
Hello,
I’ve been optimizing various code sequences relating to vector rotates recently.
I ended up proposing we expand the vector-rotate-by-immediate optab rotlm3 for
the Advanced SIMD (Neon) modes here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/665635.html
This expands to a ROTATE RT
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed
Alex Coplan as a maintainer for the AArch64 load / store pair fusion
pass.
In addition the steering committee has also appointed him as
maintainer for the Pair Fusion pass in the target independent
portions.
Please join me in
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Sent: 16 October 2024 13:05
> > To: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thomas Schwinge
> > Subject: Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx
> >
> > External email: Use
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: 16 October 2024 13:05
> To: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thomas Schwinge
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I'm not sure such a warning particularly helps, however; any ABI
> > incompatibility occurs at the point where someone changes their code to
> > stop defining bool and to use the standard bool instead. (And any problem
> > code would already have
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Eric Gallager via Gcc wrote:
> > "suggest hiding %<#%s%> from traditional C with an indented %<#%>"
>
> This is one of the things I tested when adding gcc.dg/pragma-diag-7.c
> in r8-787-g4287da829c9697:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4287da829c9697c581316
"Berger, Lutz via Gcc" writes:
> Airbus Amber
> Hallo,
> The command "gnatmake -P" cannot be executed anymore,
> because gprbuild (gnatmake is forwarded to gprbuild in that case) is
> not provided. Is there a restriction, or why it is not provided?
Hello,
it's not new that `gnatmake -P` redirec
Hi,
Thanks for the reply!
On 16/10/24 20:25, Martin Jambor wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Hello,
first and foremost, sorry for a late reply. I needed to take a larger
leave of absence for family reasons.
Comments inline:
On Thu, Aug 22 2024, Dhruv Chawla v
在 2024-10-17 17:13, ericxu...@protonmail.com 写道:
Using your method, I replaced "int main()" with "int WINAPI WinMain (HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance,
LPSTR lpCmdLine, int nShowCmd)", and the result was more assembly code added than the previous version. After reverse
engineering,
* Joseph Myers:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Jakub Jelinek via Gcc:
>>
>> > Are some of the papers/features known to be fully implemented (since which
>> > version)? E.g. for __VA_OPT__ I remember doing (and Jason too) various
>> > fixes
>> > in the past few years, like P
在 2024-10-17 16:07, Ericxu833--- via Gcc 写道:
I used IDA pro to reverse engineer test.exe and found that gcc added "call __main" to the
front of the assembly code, and then executed "jmp __do_global_ctors". I guess this code
means to instantiate C++ objects.
Yes, mostly.
My code is pure C la
Hi Ericxu833,
gcc.exe -g -O0 -x c -fno-exceptions -fno-stack-protector -fno-ident test.c -o
test.exe
I used IDA pro to reverse engineer test.exe and found that gcc added "call __main" to the
front of the assembly code, and then executed "jmp __do_global_ctors". I guess this code
means to ins
gcc version 14.2.0 (Rev1, Built by MSYS2 project)
//test.c
#include
int main() {
getchar();
return0;}
gcc.exe -g -O0 -x c -fno-exceptions -fno-stack-protector -fno-ident test.c -o
test.exe
I used IDA pro to reverse engineer test.exe and found that gcc added "call
__main" to the front of the
Airbus Amber
Hallo,
The command "gnatmake -P" cannot be executed anymore, because
gprbuild (gnatmake is forwarded to gprbuild in that case) is not provided. Is
there a restriction, or why it is not provided?
Regards
Lutz Berger
Modeling and Testing System Engineer
Integrated Team PSTS - TADVSD
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 7:14 PM Joseph Myers via Gcc wrote:
>
> One issue that showed up as test failures with a default of -std=gnu23 is
> that -std=gnu23 -Wtraditional produces a "traditional C rejects ISO C
> style function definitions" warning for function definitions with empty
> parentheses,
21 matches
Mail list logo