On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 08:21:54PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Here's a revised version of the WG14 paper, with all issues addressed.
I had a topy in the paper number. Here's the paper with the number
fixed.
Cheers,
Alex
>
> Have a lovely day!
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Oct 0
Hi Daniel,
Here's a revised version of the WG14 paper, with all issues addressed.
Have a lovely day!
Alex
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This operator is as voted in a WG14 meeting yesterday, with the only
> difference that we name it __lengthof__
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay
> Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 3:06 PM
> To: GCC Development ; Tamar Christina
>
> Subject: Re: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c
>
> Am 02.10.24 um 15:55 schrieb Georg-Johann Lay:
> > I am having problems understanding test case gc
Am 02.10.24 um 15:55 schrieb Georg-Johann Lay:
I am having problems understanding test case gcc.dg/signbit-6.c
which fails on a 16-bit platform (avr).
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-6.c;h=da186624cfa057dfc3780c8af4f6b1335ba07e7e;hb=HEAD
The relevant par
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay
> Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 2:55 PM
> To: GCC Development ; Tamar Christina
>
> Subject: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c
>
> I am having problems understanding test case gcc.dg/signbit-6.c
> which fails on a 16-bit platform (av
I am having problems understanding test case gcc.dg/signbit-6.c
which fails on a 16-bit platform (avr).
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-6.c;h=da186624cfa057dfc3780c8af4f6b1335ba07e7e;hb=HEAD
The relevant part of the code is:
int main ()
{
TYPE a[N];
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 9:54 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 6:06 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 01.10.2024 um 17:11 schrieb Matthias Kretz via Gcc :
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 9:54 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 6:06 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 01.10.2024 um 17:11 schrieb Matthias Kretz via Gcc :
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 6:06 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Am 01.10.2024 um 17:11 schrieb Matthias Kretz via Gcc :
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the unit tests are my long-standing pain point of
> > > excessive compiler memory
Ben Boeckel via Gcc writes:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 18:06:35 +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>> Analyze where the compile time is spent and where memory is spent.
>> Identify unfitting data structures and algorithms causing the issue.
>> Replace with better ones. That’s what I do for thes
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 6:06 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 01.10.2024 um 17:11 schrieb Matthias Kretz via Gcc :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the unit tests are my long-standing pain point of
> > excessive compiler memory usage and compile times. I've always worked around
> > the memory usage probl
11 matches
Mail list logo