Re: How to add an additional option to dg-compile and dg-run

2024-07-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Thomas! On 2024-07-29T10:18:49+0200, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > for the fortran-unsigned branch By the way: I did see your recent announcement; wow -- Fortran finally getting an UNSIGNED type! :-) > I would like to be able to run all > existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to mak

Re: [PATCH 6/4] libbacktrace: Add loaded dlls after initialize

2024-07-29 Thread Björn Schäpers
Am 29.07.2024 um 19:58 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:46:46 -0700 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Björn Schäpers wrote: Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 2

Re: [PATCH 6/4] libbacktrace: Add loaded dlls after initialize

2024-07-29 Thread Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
> From: Ian Lance Taylor > Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:46:46 -0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Björn Schäpers wrote: > > > > Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > > >> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100 > > >> Cc: i

Re: [PATCH 6/4] libbacktrace: Add loaded dlls after initialize

2024-07-29 Thread Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Björn Schäpers wrote: > > Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > >> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100 > >> Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org > >> From: Björn Schäpers > >> > >> Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >

Re: How to add an additional option to dg-compile and dg-run

2024-07-29 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
Am 29.07.24 um 11:22 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc: > # If a testcase doesn't have special options, use these. > global DEFAULT_FFLAGS > if ![info exists DEFAULT_FFLAGS] then { > set DEFAULT_FFLAGS " -pedantic-errors" > } I tried using that, still saw a lot of errors when compiling C files.

Re: How to add an additional option to dg-compile and dg-run

2024-07-29 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 1:20 AM Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Hi, > > for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all > existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option > does not break anything on existing code. > > Question is: How? > > I came as far as > > $ m

Second GCC 14.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2024-07-29 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
The second release candidate for GCC 14.2 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14.2.0-RC-20240729/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14.2.0-RC-20240729/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit r14-10521-gda7f0be91e2ae15. I have so far bootstrapped

Re: [RFC] Summary of libgomp failures for offloading to nvptx from AArch64

2024-07-29 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 1:35 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Richard Biener > > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 6:51 PM > > To: Prathamesh Kulkarni > > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > > Subject: Re: [RFC] Summary of libgomp failures for offloading to nvptx > > from

Re: GCC 14.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2024-07-29 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 4:34 AM Richard Biener wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:46 PM Jason Merrill via Gcc > wrote: > > > > Since the RC I've fixed a few 14/15 C++ regressions with extremely safe > > patches, and wonder what you think about pushing them to the branch at > this > > point: > >

RE: [RFC] Summary of libgomp failures for offloading to nvptx from AArch64

2024-07-29 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 6:51 PM > To: Prathamesh Kulkarni > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [RFC] Summary of libgomp failures for offloading to nvptx > from AArch64 > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > >

Re: How to add an additional option to dg-compile and dg-run

2024-07-29 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 10:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 09:20, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all > > existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option > > does not break a

Re: How to add an additional option to dg-compile and dg-run

2024-07-29 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 09:20, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all > existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option > does not break anything on existing code. > > Question is: How? > > I came as far as >

Re: GCC 14.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2024-07-29 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:46 PM Jason Merrill via Gcc wrote: > > Since the RC I've fixed a few 14/15 C++ regressions with extremely safe > patches, and wonder what you think about pushing them to the branch at this > point: > > 115583, 115986, 115561 > > Sorry these came so late. Those are all f

How to add an additional option to dg-compile and dg-run

2024-07-29 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
Hi, for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option does not break anything on existing code. Question is: How? I came as far as $ make check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-funsigned" but that