“ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost”

Hi Vladimir, With my patch for PR111673 (scale the spill/restore cost of callee-save register with the frequency of the entry bb in the routine assign_hard_reg() : https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/631849.html), the following Linaro aarch64 test failed due to an extra 'mov'

gcc-11-20240612 is now available

Snapshot gcc-11-20240612 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20240612/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Sourceware Open Office, Friday 16:00 UTC

Friday June 14, 16:00 UTC, irc.libera.chat #overseers To get the right time in your local timezone: $ date -d "Fri May 10 16:00:00 UTC 2024" - Discussion topic: https://sourceware.org/sourceware-security-vision.html The Sourceware infrastructure security vision explains what Sourceware is

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 14:23, Mikael Morin wrote: > > Le 12/06/2024 à 14:58, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Mikael Morin via Gcc wrote: > >> > >> Le 12/06/2024 à 13:48, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hou

Re: Question about optimizing function pointers for direct function calls

Hi Richard, Thanks for your reply. I'm looking forward to hearing from Honza! But I still have a small question about the IPA passes. If I want to make such a conversion (sum += foo[i].add == add ? add (1,2) : foo[i].add (1,2);), I definitely need to change the function's body. But the article "U

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 04:53:38PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > > Perhaps you could create a mirror version of the repo and do some > > experiments locally on that to identify where the bottle-neck is coming > > from? > > > Not sure where to start for that.Are the hooks published somewhere? Yes

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

Le 12/06/2024 à 16:34, Richard Earnshaw (lists) a écrit : On 12/06/2024 14:23, Mikael Morin via Gcc wrote: Le 12/06/2024 à 14:58, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Mikael Morin via Gcc wrote: Le 12/06/2024 à 13:48, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : Hi! Yesterday the gcc git rep

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

On 12/06/2024 14:23, Mikael Morin via Gcc wrote: > Le 12/06/2024 à 14:58, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Mikael Morin via Gcc wrote: >>> >>> Le 12/06/2024 à 13:48, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : Hi! Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hours lo

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

Le 12/06/2024 à 14:58, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Mikael Morin via Gcc wrote: Le 12/06/2024 à 13:48, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : Hi! Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hours locked by user mikael at 2024-06-11 13:27:44.301067 (pid = 974167) 78:06 pytho

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Mikael Morin via Gcc wrote: > > Le 12/06/2024 à 13:48, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : > > Hi! > > > > Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hours > > locked by user mikael at 2024-06-11 13:27:44.301067 (pid = 974167) > > 78:06 python hooks/update.py > > refs/use

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

Le 12/06/2024 à 14:14, Mark Wielaard a écrit : Hi, On Wed, 2024-06-12 at 13:48 +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hours locked by user mikael at 2024-06-11 13:27:44.301067 (pid = 974167) 78:06 python hooks/update.py refs/users/mikael/tags/fortr

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

Le 12/06/2024 à 13:48, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : Hi! Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hours locked by user mikael at 2024-06-11 13:27:44.301067 (pid = 974167) 78:06 python hooks/update.py refs/users/mikael/tags/fortran-dev_merges/r10-1545

Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

Hi, On Wed, 2024-06-12 at 13:48 +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hours > locked by user mikael at 2024-06-11 13:27:44.301067 (pid = 974167) > 78:06 python hooks/update.py > refs/users/mikael/tags/fortran-dev_merges/r10-1545 > 000

gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row

Hi! Yesterday the gcc git repository was locked for 3 hours locked by user mikael at 2024-06-11 13:27:44.301067 (pid = 974167) 78:06 python hooks/update.py refs/users/mikael/tags/fortran-dev_merges/r10-1545 c2f9fe1d8111b9671bf0aa8362446516fd942f1d process

Re: Question about optimizing function pointers for direct function calls

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 11:57 AM Hanke Zhang wrote: > > Richard Biener 于2024年5月24日周五 14:39写道： > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 5:53 AM Hanke Zhang via Gcc wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > I got a question about optimizing function pointers for direct > > > function calls in C. > > > > > > Consider th

Re: Question about optimizing function pointers for direct function calls

Richard Biener 于2024年5月24日周五 14:39写道： > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 5:53 AM Hanke Zhang via Gcc wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I got a question about optimizing function pointers for direct > > function calls in C. > > > > Consider the following scenario: one of the fields of a structure is a > > function

Re: How to represent a fallthrough condtion (with no else) in "Match and Simplify"?

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:57 AM Hanke Zhang via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to study "Match and Simplify" recently, and I had this sample code: > > int main() { > int n = 1000; > int *a = malloc (sizeof(int) * n); > int *b = malloc (sizeof(int) * n); > int *c = malloc (sizeof(int) *