unsubscribe

unsubscribe On 7/5/2024, 8:34 pm, "gcc-announce on behalf of Richard Biener via gcc-announce" mailto:sydney.edu...@gcc.gnu.org> on behalf of gcc-annou...@gcc.gnu.org > wrote: The GCC developers are proud to announce a new major GCC release, 14.1. The C front

gcc-11-20240508 is now available

Snapshot gcc-11-20240508 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20240508/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: FE C++ requirement

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 04:40:55PM -0400, James K. Lowden wrote: > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.32' not > found (required by build-O2/gcc/cobol1 The cc1/cc1plus/f951/... binaries are normally linked with -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc in second and later stages (fir

FE C++ requirement

/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.32' not found (required by build-O2/gcc/cobol1 The above error comes from ldd(1). I'm experimenting with what's minimally needed to install gcc when configured with --languages=cobol. Until this week, we always used --languages=c++,cob

Re: Error in gcc 14 porting document

On Mai 08 2024, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > removed from C99. I think you mean "removed from C *after* C99". -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."

Re: Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

On 5/7/24 20:44, Toon Moene wrote: On 5/7/24 20:35, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 11:31 AM Toon Moene wrote: On 5/7/24 00:02, Toon Moene wrote: OK, perhaps on the aarch64 I need the following option to make the comparison fair: ‘rdma’   Enable Round Double Multiply Acc

Re: Error in gcc 14 porting document

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 2:06 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs via Gcc wrote: > > On 08.05.24 11:50, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics > > > > and features that were removed fro

Re: Error in gcc 14 porting document

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs via Gcc wrote: > On 08.05.24 11:50, Richard Biener wrote: > > > "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics > > > and features that were removed from C99" > > > > > > Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense

Re: Error in gcc 14 porting document

On 08.05.24 11:50, Richard Biener wrote: "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics and features that were removed from C99" Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense. In the context of mentioning the -std=gnu89/-std=c89 workarounds I thought as much, but shoul

Re: Error in gcc 14 porting document

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:39 AM Matthias Urlichs via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/porting_to.html states: > > "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics > and features that were removed from C99" > > Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense.

Error in gcc 14 porting document

Hello, https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/porting_to.html states: "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics and features that were removed from C99" Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense. -- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: