Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 11:41 PM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote: > > > > On 5/1/24 2:04 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > > On 5/1/24 12:15, Jeff Law wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 4/22/24 9:24 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>> Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried > >>> Jason> unsuccessfully. > >

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Tom Tromey
> Do you (or others) have any thoughts about GitLab FOSS? Dunno about the FOSS edition specifically, but I've used many review tools in anger in the last 5 years: github, gitlab, gerrit, phabricator, and a couple that ran in bugzilla ("MozReview", not sure if it had some other name; and a second o

gcc-11-20240501 is now available

2024-05-01 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-11-20240501 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20240501/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior via Gcc
On Wednesday, May 01 2024, Mark Wielaard wrote: [...] > But the part that interests me most is the self-registration part that > Sergio setup. I believe we will need that for whatever system we end > up with to make it as easy to contribute as it is with email. > https://blog.sergiodj.net/posts/in

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 5/1/24 2:04 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 5/1/24 12:15, Jeff Law wrote: On 4/22/24 9:24 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried Jason> unsuccessfully. We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it.  We tried to integrate it into the traditional

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Jason, On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 04:04:37PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 5/1/24 12:15, Jeff Law wrote: > >We're currently using patchwork to track patches tagged with > >RISC-V.  We don't do much review with patchwork.  In that model > >patchwork ultimately just adds overhead as I'm constantl

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Simon Marchi via Gcc
On 2024-05-01 16:53, Tom Tromey via Overseers wrote: > Mark> See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997 > Mark> We really should automate this. There are several people running > Mark> scripts by hand. The easiest would be to simply run it from a git > Mark> hook. patchwork

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Tom Tromey
Mark> See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997 Mark> We really should automate this. There are several people running Mark> scripts by hand. The easiest would be to simply run it from a git Mark> hook. patchwork comes with a simple script that just calculates the Mark> hash a

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Jonathan, On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 08:38:26PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 20:19, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote: > > We're currently using patchwork to track patches tagged with RISC-V. We > > don't do much review with patchwork. In that model patchwork ultimately > > just a

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc
On 5/1/24 12:15, Jeff Law wrote: On 4/22/24 9:24 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried Jason> unsuccessfully. We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it.  We tried to integrate it into the traditional gdb development style, having it send email

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 20:19, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote: > > > > On 4/22/24 9:24 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried > > Jason> unsuccessfully. > > > > We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it. We tried to integrate it > > into the traditional

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-01 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 4/22/24 9:24 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried Jason> unsuccessfully. We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it. We tried to integrate it into the traditional gdb development style, having it send email to gdb-patches. I found these s

Re: GCC 14.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2024-05-01 Thread Frank Scheiner via Gcc
Bootstrapping the following configuration (with LRA enabled) looks good for ia64, too: ``` CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIC" \ CXXFLAGS="-O2 -fPIC" \ ../configure --prefix=/usr \ --enable-obsolete \ --libdir=/usr/lib \ --mandir=/usr/man \ --infodir=/usr/info \ --enable-shared \ --enable-bootstrap \ --enable-lan

Re: How to format code in GCC style?

2024-05-01 Thread Marc via Gcc
Hanke Zhang via Gcc writes: > Hi Filip, > > Thanks for your reply. But I'm not so familiar with VIM actually. Thus > when I try the options listed there, nothing happened. (VSCODE is the > IDE I'm using for development.) > > And I notice that there is a `vimrc` in the `contrib` directory, I > tri