On 2024-04-23 11:08, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Indeed. Though Patchwork is another option for patch tracking, that
>> glibc seem to be having success with.
>
> We tried this in gdb as well. It was completely unworkable -- you have
> to manually clear out the patch queue, meaning it's normally full
> Indeed. Though Patchwork is another option for patch tracking, that
> glibc seem to be having success with.
We tried this in gdb as well. It was completely unworkable -- you have
to manually clear out the patch queue, meaning it's normally full of
patches that already landed. I know glibc has
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:32 AM Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
wrote:
>
> I've been forced to use gerrit occasionally. I hate it. No, I LOATHE it.
> The UI is anything but intuitive with features hidden behind unobvious
> selections. IMO It's not a tool for a casual developer, which makes
* Jason Merrill:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:42 AM Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> > "Frank" == Frank Ch Eigler writes:
>
> >> [...] I suggest that a basic principle for such a system is that it
> >> should be *easy* to obtain and maintain a local copy of the history
> >> of all pull requests.
On 23/04/2024 09:56, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:51:00PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:24 PM Tom Tromey wrote:
>>> Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried
>>> Jason> unsuccessfully.
>>>
>>> We tried it and gdb and
On 23/04/2024 04:24, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried
> Jason> unsuccessfully.
>
> We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it. We tried to integrate it
> into the traditional gdb development style, having it send email to
> gdb-patches. I found
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:51:00PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:24 PM Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried
> > Jason> unsuccessfully.
> >
> > We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it. We tried to integrate it
> >
