Re: Patches submission policy change

2024-04-04 Thread Marc via Gcc
Mark Wielaard writes: Hello Mark! > gcc-patches, binutils and gdb-patches all have only one moderator > (Jeff, Ian and Thiago). It would probably be good if there were > more. > > Any volunteers? It shouldn't be more than 1 to 3 emails a week > (sadly most of them spam). If still needed, I volu

Modifying GCC source code

2024-04-04 Thread Dan via Gcc
Hello! I am trying to slightly modify the source code of GCC to display some messages when the compiler is executed in the terminal. For example, when 'gcc source.c' is executed, I want a print message saying "Building with GCC..." and if the build is successful, "Build Successful!" should be disp

gcc-11-20240404 is now available

2024-04-04 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-11-20240404 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20240404/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: Patches submission policy change

2024-04-04 Thread Simon Marchi via Gcc
On 2024-04-04 17:35, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0200, Christophe Lyon via Gdb wrote: >> TL;DR: For the sake of improving precommit CI coverage and simplifying >> workflows, I’d like to request a patch submission policy change, so >> that we now

Re: Patches submission policy change

2024-04-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christophe, On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0200, Christophe Lyon via Gdb wrote: > TL;DR: For the sake of improving precommit CI coverage and simplifying > workflows, I’d like to request a patch submission policy change, so > that we now include regenerated files. This was discussed during

Re: Sourceware mitigating and preventing the next xz-backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Michael Matz via Gcc
Hello, On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, Jonathon Anderson wrote: > Of course, this doesn't make the build system any less complex, but > projects using newer build systems seem easier to secure and audit than > those using overly flexible build systems like Autotools and maybe even > CMake. IMHO using a la

Re: Sourceware mitigating and preventing the next xz-backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 08:42 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 4/3/24 8:04 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > > > > > > "Florian" == Florian Weimer writes: > > > > Florian> Everyone still pushes their own patches, and there are no > > Florian> technical countermeasures in place to ensure that the pushed >

Re: Sourceware mitigating and preventing the next xz-backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 08:53 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024, 3:09 AM Florian Weimer via Gdb > wrote: > > * Guinevere Larsen via Overseers: > > > > > Beyond that, we (GDB) are already experimenting with approved-by, and > > > I think glibc was doing the same. > > > > The g

Re: Patches submission policy change

2024-04-04 Thread Jan Beulich via Gcc
On 03.04.2024 15:11, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 10:30, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> On 03.04.2024 10:22, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>> Dear release managers and developers, >>> >>> TL;DR: For the sake of improving precommit CI coverage and simplifying >>> workflows, I’d like to reques