On 3/18/24 13:25, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Well the rule to regenerate Makefile.in (eg in in opcodes/) is a bit
> more complex
> than just calling automake. IIUC it calls automake --foreign it any of
> *.m4 file from $(am__configure_deps) that is newer than Makefile.in
> (with an early exit in the
On 3/18/24 13:28, Christophe Lyon via Gdb wrote:
> I'm not up-to-date with gdb's policy about patches: are they supposed
> to be posted with or without the regenerated parts included?
> IIUC they are not included in patch submissions for binutils and gcc,
> which makes the pre-commit CI miss some p
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 2:10 PM Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> > not sure if the current autoregen.py is in sync with that?
>
> I'm curious why "autoreconf -f" is insufficient.
> It seems to me that this should work.
`autoreconf -f` works fine in individual subdirectories, the problem
is that the top-leve
