https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/libstdc++/api/a10385.html
should be the latest. I thought there is a std::string/char* constructor.
-Original Message-
From: Ming Cheng
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 2:20 PM
To: Jonathan Wakely
Cc: GCC Development
Subject: RE: GCC Decimal128
Thanks, I'll check them out.
On Wed, 24 Jan, 2024, 03:52 Martin Jambor, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. GCC has
> applied to be part of GSoC 2024 but of course selected organizations
> have not been announced yet.
>
> On Fri, Jan 12 2024, Gaurang
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:33 PM Björn Schäpers wrote:
>
> Am 03.01.2024 um 00:12 schrieb Björn Schäpers:
> > Am 30.11.2023 um 20:53 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:55 AM Björn Schäpers wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Björn Schäpers
> >>>
> >>> Fixes https://github.com/ianlanceta
Hello,
We are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. GCC has
applied to be part of GSoC 2024 but of course selected organizations
have not been announced yet.
On Fri, Jan 12 2024, Gaurang Aswal via Gcc wrote:
> Hey I am Gaurang Aswal a 4th year B.E. Computer Science student from BI
Am 03.01.2024 um 00:12 schrieb Björn Schäpers:
Am 30.11.2023 um 20:53 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:55 AM Björn Schäpers wrote:
From: Björn Schäpers
Fixes https://github.com/ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace/issues/53, except
that libraries loaded after the backtrace_initial
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 14:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 02:01, Ming Cheng via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > Hi GCC,
> >
> > Seems Janis is not at IBM. Wondering someone from GCC can help my question?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ming.
> >
> > From: Ming Cheng
> > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 02:01, Ming Cheng via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi GCC,
>
> Seems Janis is not at IBM. Wondering someone from GCC can help my question?
>
> Thanks
> Ming.
>
> From: Ming Cheng
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 3:18 PM
> To: janis...@us.ibm.com
> Subject: GCC Decimal128 class
>
> Hi Jani
Hi,
These instructions looks to be part of the T-head vendor extension instruction
set. With the spec here https://github.com/T-head-Semi/thead-extension-spec.
Best regards
Alex
> On Jan 23, 2024, at 8:42 AM, jacob navia via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi
> The GNU assembler supports two instructions fo
Hi
The GNU assembler supports two instructions for the T-Head risk machines called:
th.ipop
th.ipush
With no arguments. These instructions (they are no macros or aliases) are
UNDOCUMENTED in the T-Head instruction manuals that I have, and a google search
yields absolutely nothing.
Can anyone h
On 23.01.2024 10:21, LIU Hao wrote:
> 在 2024-01-23 17:03, Jan Beulich 写道:
>> Hmm, that would suggest to me that the Dwarf code abuses the interface.
>> A "name" certainly shouldn't be an expression. And hence the result of
>> the example ought to be
>>
>> .long "LXXYY"-1# "LXXYY" minus on
在 2024-01-23 17:03, Jan Beulich 写道:
Hmm, that would suggest to me that the Dwarf code abuses the interface.
A "name" certainly shouldn't be an expression. And hence the result of
the example ought to be
.long "LXXYY"-1# "LXXYY" minus one
So I shouldn't have checked for `*` right?
Th
On 23.01.2024 10:00, LIU Hao wrote:
> 在 2024-01-23 16:38, Jan Beulich 写道:
>> Right, but this is very "draft". You can't blindly assume the gas you use
>> actually can deal with quotation.
>
> Let's assume that for the time being, but there's something else; see below.
>
>
>>> .refptr.bx:
>>>
在 2024-01-23 16:38, Jan Beulich 写道:
Right, but this is very "draft". You can't blindly assume the gas you use
actually can deal with quotation.
Let's assume that for the time being, but there's something else; see below.
.refptr.bx:
.quad bx
Sure, this one needs quoting then, t
On 23.01.2024 02:27, LIU Hao wrote:
> 在 2024-01-22 16:39, Jan Beulich 写道:
>> Right, I did some work in that direction a while ago. But iirc there are
>> still cases left to be addressed.
>
> Attached is a draft patch for GCC, bootstrapped on {i686,x86_64}-w64-mingw32
> with GCC 13.2 and
> binuti
14 matches
Mail list logo
