Re: NOP_EXPR vs. CONVERT_EXPR

2023-12-07 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:24 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 12/5/23 07:53, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:54 PM Alexander Monakov via Gcc > > wrote: > >> > >> Greetings, > >> > >> the definitions for NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR in tree.def, having survived > >> all the way

Re: strub causing libgcc to fail to build on rl78-elf

2023-12-07 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 12/6/23 15:03, DJ Delorie wrote: Alexandre Oliva writes: This looks like a latent bug in the port. I'm not surprised, that port was weird. This was just a plain asm insn in strub.c: /* Make sure the stack overwrites are not optimized away. */ asm ("" : : "m" (end[0])); whose

Re: NOP_EXPR vs. CONVERT_EXPR

2023-12-07 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 12/5/23 07:53, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:54 PM Alexander Monakov via Gcc wrote: Greetings, the definitions for NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR in tree.def, having survived all the way from 1992, currently say: /* Represents a conversion of type of a value.

gcc-11-20231207 is now available

2023-12-07 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-11-20231207 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20231207/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: libgcov, fork, and mingw (and other targets without the full POSIX set)

2023-12-07 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 13:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 01:03:01PM +0100, Jan Hubicka via Gcc wrote: > > > On Dez 01 2023, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > > > > > > Hmm, so why's it then referenced and not "GCed"? > > > > > > This has nothing to do with ga