Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673

2023-11-28 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc
Richard Earnshaw writes: > On 28/11/2023 12:52, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> Thanks a lot for your response! >> >> Another failure reported by the Linaro CI is as follows : >> (Note: I am planning to send a separate mail for each failure, as this will >> make >> the discussion e

Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673

2023-11-28 Thread Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
On 28/11/2023 12:52, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote: Hi Richard, Thanks a lot for your response! Another failure reported by the Linaro CI is as follows : (Note: I am planning to send a separate mail for each failure, as this will make the discussion easy to track) FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/a

Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673

2023-11-28 Thread Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
Hi Richard, Thanks a lot for your response! Another failure reported by the Linaro CI is as follows : (Note: I am planning to send a separate mail for each failure, as this will make the discussion easy to track) FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/cpy_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve -moverride=t

Sourceware infrastructure updates for Q4 2023

2023-11-28 Thread Mark Wielaard
Sourceware infrastructure community updates for Q4 2023 - 6 months with the Software Freedom Conservancy - Sourceware @ Fosdem - OSUOSL provides extra larger arm64 and x86_64 buildbot servers - No more From rewriting for patches mailinglists = 6 months with the Software Freedom Conservancy Sourc