On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 21:16:40 +0200, Damien Guibouret wrote:
> I think the comparison should be ">" instead of ">=" as 0x10 seems a
> valid value (Unicode says value above 0x10 is invalid).
> Other tests around same value in this file are using ">".
Ah, good catch. I'll make a separate
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 16:50:27 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/25/23 13:06, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > - header-unit information fields
> >
> > Header units (including the standard library headers) are 100%
> > unsupported right now because the `-E` mechanism wants to import their
> > BMIs. A new
Le 19/06/2023 à 23:34, Jason Merrill a écrit :
On 6/6/23 16:50, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Unicode does not support such values because they are unrepresentable in
UTF-16.
Pushed.
libcpp/
* charset.cc: Reject encodings of codepoints above 0x10.
UTF-16 does not support such codepoints an
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 17:33:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 5/12/23 10:24, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > `file` can be omitted (the `output_stream` will be used then). I *think*
> > I see that adding:
> >
> > %{fdeps_file:-fdeps-file=%{!o:%b.ddi}%{o*:%.ddi%*}}
>
> %{!fdeps-file: but yes.
>
>
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has decided
to adopt a Code of Conduct (https://gcc.gnu.org/conduct.html) for
interactions in GCC project spaces, including mailing lists, bugzilla,
and IRC.
The vast majority of the time, the GCC community is a very civil,
cooperative space
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 03:03:19PM +, Michael Matz via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
>
> > ce1 pass results in emit_conditional_move with
> > (gt (reg/v:SF 83 [ x ]) (reg:SF 84)), (reg/v:SF 83 [ x ]), (reg:SF 84)
> > operands in the GCC 11 case and
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> ce1 pass results in emit_conditional_move with
> (gt (reg/v:SF 83 [ x ]) (reg:SF 84)), (reg/v:SF 83 [ x ]), (reg:SF 84)
> operands in the GCC 11 case and so is successfully matched by
> ix86_expand_fp_movcc as ix86_expand_sse_fp_minmax.
>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:15:37AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:45 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 09:10:53PM +0200, André Günther via Gcc wrote:
> > > I noticed that a simple function like
> > > auto relu( float x ) {
> > > return x
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:45 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 09:10:53PM +0200, André Günther via Gcc wrote:
> > I noticed that a simple function like
> > auto relu( float x ) {
> > return x > 0.f ? x : 0.f;
> > }
> > compiles to different ASM using GCC11 (or lower)
