Arsen Arsenović writes:
> Any development style making documentation a source of truth matches
> this principle. This does not refer to ISO specifications specifically,
> though, normally, unless the standard disagrees with reality, as
> implicit-... did many years ago, ISO decisions are taken s
Snapshot gcc-14-20230514 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20230514/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
FYI I reported this crash to the GCC bugzilla yesterday:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109850
and it was closed as a dup of this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109241
If people want to watch it.
On Sun, 2023-05-14 at 10:50 +, Thomas Backlund via Gcc wrote:
>
Jonathan Wakely writes:
Wrong. I wouldn't bother replying to you again in this thread, but I
feel that as a gcc maintainer I should confirm that Eli S. is right
here; and nobody else I know agrees with your definition of extension
as "every non-standard aspect of the compiler's behaviour, whethe
Po Lu via Gcc writes:
...
> Where is it written that GNU CC follows your so-called
> ``specification-driven development''?
Any development style making documentation a source of truth matches
this principle. This does not refer to ISO specifications specifically,
though, normally, unless the
Hi Po,
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 09:53:30PM +0800, Po Lu via Gcc wrote:
> I don't want anything, seeing as I've been using GCC less and less over
> the years (for this and other reasons.) I'm just throwing in my two or
> so cents.
I think you have contributed more than two cents and it time to sto
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> Wrong. I wouldn't bother replying to you again in this thread, but I
> feel that as a gcc maintainer I should confirm that Eli S. is right
> here; and nobody else I know agrees with your definition of extension
> as "every non-standard aspect of the compiler's behaviour,
Eli Schwartz writes:
> Does this mean you've conceded the point, and no longer think it is
> written in C++?
No.
> You are correct in reading my sentence, that is indeed what I said.
>
> Aside: you have reiterated "the behavior of the translator itself" over
> and over again, but it hasn't been
ccache 4.8.0 build fails with ICE when building with gcc 12.3.0:
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31893#c0
regression introduced in gcc-12-20230421 snapshot by commit:
From 890d711a2477119a34cf435f6159b6253b124374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Merrill <
ja...@redhat.com
>
Date: Thu,
On 14/05/2023 07:28, Po Lu via Gcc wrote:
Eli Schwartz writes:
Quoting my previous reply on the topic.
Until everyone is on the same page as you about whether these are GNUC
extensions, this conversation will go nowhere.
You are of the opinion that "GCC currently behaves a certain way when
c
On Sun, 14 May 2023, 11:21 Jonathan Wakely, wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 14 May 2023, 10:47 David Brown, wrote:
>
>> On 14/05/2023 07:38, Po Lu via Gcc wrote:
>>
>> > No, all you have to do is to tell GNU CC to compile Standard C. But
>> > what's being debated here is the behavior of GNU CC when transl
On Sun, 14 May 2023, 10:47 David Brown, wrote:
> On 14/05/2023 07:38, Po Lu via Gcc wrote:
>
> > No, all you have to do is to tell GNU CC to compile Standard C. But
> > what's being debated here is the behavior of GNU CC when translating
> > both Standard C and GNU C, so your demonstration is al
On 14/05/2023 07:38, Po Lu via Gcc wrote:
No, all you have to do is to tell GNU CC to compile Standard C. But
what's being debated here is the behavior of GNU CC when translating
both Standard C and GNU C, so your demonstration is almost completely
pointless.
You keep using the term "Standard
On Sun, 14 May 2023, 06:28 Po Lu, wrote:
> Eli Schwartz writes:
>
> > Quoting my previous reply on the topic.
> >
> > Until everyone is on the same page as you about whether these are GNUC
> > extensions, this conversation will go nowhere.
> >
> > You are of the opinion that "GCC currently behav
14 matches
Mail list logo
