Hi!
Sorry, let me try again -- our IT department likes to garble emails in
order to attach a "disclaimer"...
On 2023-03-13T21:37:24+0100, I wrote:
> Hi Madhu!
>
> (As you've sent your equally worded
> "GSoC'2023: Bypass assembler when generating LTO object files: GCC" email
> to , let me also Cc
-
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634
München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas
Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht
München, HRB 106955
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Madhu!
(As
Hello,
My name is Raiki Tamura, an undergraduate student at Kyoto University in
Japan and I want to work on Unicode support in gccrs this year.
I have already written my proposal (linked below) and shared it with the
gccrs team in Zulip.
In the project, I am planning to use the GNU unistring libra
On Sun, 2023-03-12 at 23:20 +0100, Shengyu Huang wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> > >
> > > 4. What’s the most interesting to me are PR103533
> > > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103533),
> >
> > Turning on taint detection by default would be a great project. It
> > would be good to run the
On 3/13/23 14:29, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 04:48:14PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, 12:53 Basile Starynkevitch,
wrote:
Hello all,
Andrea observed that:
In gcc 8.3.0, compiling
enum
test
{
FIRST = 1,
SECOND = 1,
THIR
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 04:48:14PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, 12:53 Basile Starynkevitch,
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > Andrea observed that:
> >
> > In gcc 8.3.0, compiling
> >
> >
> > enum
> > test
> >{
> > FIRST = 1,
> > SECOND = 1,
> >
Respected sir/mam,
Actually I want to know what are skills you desire to have in the members
of your organization as I’m aware with c &c++ so, can you please let me
know other than this what knowledge should I know for getting selected in
your franchise in deep
Hi,
I was debugging PR96059 and ran into a question which does not seem
obvious from the code.
For the test case in the PR, in ipa.cc:remove_unreachable_nodes, GCC
seems to try to remove an unreachable function that was already inlined
into a different unreachable function. When the original inl
