On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:54 AM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> C2x allows variable-argument functions declared with (...) as parameters -
> no named arguments - as in C++. It *also* allows such functions to access
> their parameters, unlike C++, by relaxing the requirements on va_start so
> it no longer
On Mon, 2022-10-17 at 15:28 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Based on the very positive feedback I was given at the Cauldron Sphinx
> Documentation BoF,
> I'm planning migrating the documentation on 9th November. There are still
> some minor comments
> from Sandra when it comes to the PDF
C2x allows variable-argument functions declared with (...) as parameters -
no named arguments - as in C++. It *also* allows such functions to access
their parameters, unlike C++, by relaxing the requirements on va_start so
it no longer needs to be passed the name of the last named parameter.
M
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Currently, there is a tarball with texinfo sources for all the manuals
> > for each version.
>
> Well, then equivalent would be packaging all .rst files together with the
> corresponding
> conf.py, logo.* and other files. But I don't see it much usefu
On 10/19/22 05:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 10/18/22 00:26, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 10/17/22 07:28, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Based on the very positive feedback I was given at the Cauldron Sphinx
Documentation BoF,
I'm planning migrating the documentation on 9th November. There are still s
On 10/19/22 01:46, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 5:44 AM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
On 10/18/22 20:09, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On 10/18/22 16:36, Jeff Law wrote:
There isn't a great place in GCC to handle this right now. If the
constraints were relaxed in PRE, then we'd have a ch
Status
==
The GCC 10 branch is in regression and documentation fixing mode.
Apparently I haven't sent a status report after 10.4 got released,
so sending one now. GCC 10.5 is still many months away, maybe spring
next year.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last re
On 10/19/22 04:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The screw-up on my side with libstdc++ testing (tested normally rather
than in C++23 mode) makes me wonder if we couldn't tweak the default
testing.
Dunno what libstdc++ testing normally does (just C++17?), make check-g++
tests by default { 98, 14, 17,
Hi all,
Here is the agenda for tomorrow's RISC-V GNU toolchain meeting. If you have any
topics want to
discuss or share, please let me know and I will add them to the agenda, thanks.
Agenda:
- RISC-V profile develop plan
- Patchwork for patch initial review
- RISC-V sub-extension s
On 10/19/22 13:09, Martin Liška wrote:
> There ePUB would be likely better output format. What do you think?
I've just included ePUB books:
https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/#epub
Martin
On 10/18/22 00:26, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 10/17/22 07:28, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Based on the very positive feedback I was given at the Cauldron Sphinx
>> Documentation BoF,
>> I'm planning migrating the documentation on 9th November. There are still
>> some minor comments
>> f
On 10/19/22 10:13, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:24:06AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 10/17/22 16:16, Paul Iannetta wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for porting the documentation to Sphinx, it is
>>> very convenient to use, especially the menu on the left an
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 09:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The screw-up on my side with libstdc++ testing (tested normally rather
> than in C++23 mode) makes me wonder if we couldn't tweak the default
> testing.
> Dunno what libstdc++ testing normally does (just C++17?),
That's the default un
Hi!
The screw-up on my side with libstdc++ testing (tested normally rather
than in C++23 mode) makes me wonder if we couldn't tweak the default
testing.
Dunno what libstdc++ testing normally does (just C++17?), make check-g++
tests by default { 98, 14, 17, 20 } (and I regularly use
GXX_TESTSUITE_S
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:24:06AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/17/22 16:16, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Thank you very much for porting the documentation to Sphinx, it is
> > very convenient to use, especially the menu on the left and the
> > search bar.
>
> Thanks, I also
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 5:44 AM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
>
>
> On 10/18/22 20:09, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >
> > On 10/18/22 16:36, Jeff Law wrote:
> There isn't a great place in GCC to handle this right now. If the
> constraints were relaxed in PRE, then we'd have a chance, but
> gett
On 10/17/22 16:16, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank you very much for porting the documentation to Sphinx, it is
> very convenient to use, especially the menu on the left and the
> search bar.
Thanks, I also like it!
>
> However, I also regularly browse and search the documentation t
On 10/18/22 14:22, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 13:08:46 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 16:21 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> David Malcolm would probably know best about JSON wrangling.
>>
>> Unfortunately our JSON output doesn't make any guarantees about the
18 matches
Mail list logo
