Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark

2022-07-19 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 11:27, lkcl via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:41 AM David Edelsohn wrote: > > > > Luke, > > > > The GCC Community will give the issues that you raised due > > consideration and resolve any problems through appropriate channels. > > David: although this was a pri

Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark

2022-07-19 Thread lkcl via Gcc
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:41 AM David Edelsohn wrote: > > Luke, > > The GCC Community will give the issues that you raised due > consideration and resolve any problems through appropriate channels. David: although this was a private reply I am assuming that is in error, and i feel it is appropri

Re: [RFC] Function Multi Versioning on Arm

2022-07-19 Thread Martin Liška
On 7/18/22 12:36, Daniel Kiss via Gcc wrote: > Hello, > > We are going to add Function Multiversioning [1] support to Arm architectures. > The specification is made public as beta[2] to ensure toolchain that follows > Arm > C Language Extension will implement it in the same way. > > A few tweaks

Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark

2022-07-19 Thread Florian Weimer via Gcc
* Arthur Cohen: > Hi Florian, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022, 20:33 Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > No. It would actually make matters worse for GCC in this case because > the stated intent is to ship without a borrow checker (“There are no > immediate plans for a borrow checker as this is not req

Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark

2022-07-19 Thread Gabriel Ravier via Gcc
On 7/19/22 01:09, lkcl via Gcc wrote: On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:01 PM David Malcolm wrote: Luke: you appear to me to be the one who is telling people what patches they can and cannot apply, and it's pissing me off. 1) please don't you dare put words into my mouth that i did not state. f