Snapshot gcc-10-20220422 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20220422/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 16:08:00 +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> Ben Boeckel writes:
> > I agree that the header needs to be *found*, but scanning cannot require
> > a pre-existing BMI for that header.
>
> Well, if scanning cannot require a pre-existing BMI but a pre-existing
> BMI is required to
> On 22 Apr 2022, at 15:08, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
>
> Ben Boeckel writes:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 06:05:52 +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think it is. A header unit (unlike a named module) may export
>>> macros which could affect further dependencies. Consider:
>>>
>>>
Ben Boeckel writes:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 06:05:52 +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
>
> > I don't think it is. A header unit (unlike a named module) may export
> > macros which could affect further dependencies. Consider:
> >
> > import "header-unit.hpp"; // May or may not export macro FOO.
> >
