On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 14:38 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 3/25/22 12:45, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 17:52 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > > On 23/03/2022 17:31, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The concern is that the constraints implied by atttributes
>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:51:30PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [adding kernel folk who work on asm stuff]
>
> As a heads-up, GCC 12 (not yet released) appears to erroneously optimize away
> calls to functions with volatile asm. Szabolcs has raised an issue on the GCC
> bugzilla:
>
Hi,
There is a CVE [1] for zlib < 1.2.12 (released march 27th).
GCC currently uses zlib 1.2.11, and binutils-gdb imports the zlib
directory from GCC. The recommendation is to get it updated to 1.2.12,
which contains the proper fix [2].
It might not affect gcc/binutils/gdb since the code does
On 05/04/2022 14:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:51:30PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> My x86_64 test case is:
>
> Per compiler explorer (https://godbolt.org/z/cveff9hq5) GCC trunk currently
> compiles this as:
>
> | msr_rmw_set_bits:
> | mov rcx, rdi
> | rdm
Sorry, I copied the wrong version of the x86_64 assembly as generated by GCC
11.2.0). Updated below.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:51:30PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> My x86_64 test case is:
>
> | unsigned long rdmsr(unsigned long reg)
> | {
> | unsigned int lo, hi;
> |
> | asm volatile(
>
Hi all,
[adding kernel folk who work on asm stuff]
As a heads-up, GCC 12 (not yet released) appears to erroneously optimize away
calls to functions with volatile asm. Szabolcs has raised an issue on the GCC
bugzilla:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
... which is a P1 rele
