Re: [PATCH] testsuite: avoid analyzer asm failures on non-Linux

2022-02-07 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 18:08 +0100, FX wrote: > Hi David, > > > Thanks.  I extended your patch as follows, which works successfully > > for > > me on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > > > Does the following look OK for the analyzer asm failures on > > x86_64-apple-darwin? > > Sorry for the late reply… yes

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: avoid analyzer asm failures on non-Linux

2022-02-07 Thread FX via Gcc
Hi David, > Thanks. I extended your patch as follows, which works successfully for > me on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Does the following look OK for the analyzer asm failures on > x86_64-apple-darwin? Sorry for the late reply… yes it does! FX

Re: Compiling GCC source

2022-02-07 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 8:14 PM Mohamed Atef via Gcc wrote: > > After i built it > I tried make - j 8 and it's recompiling now i thought i will have messege > like > Every thing is up to date or there are no change done > But it actually started to compile again If you modify parts of gcc/ only th

Re: Query regarding generating NOTE instruction at GIMPLE level

2022-02-07 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 8:42 PM Shubham Narlawar via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, > > Is it possible to generate a NOTE instruction at GIMPLE level? > > My use case scenario is as below - > I want to create a note for __builtin_xyz(_x) such that there is a > placeholder just before function call and in RT