On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:57:54AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 12/3/21 5:56 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> >> Note, we want to test both building gcc on ppc64le with older glibc
> >> and newer glibc (and that libgfortran will have the same ABI between both
> >> and on
List-Unsubscribe
On 12/4/21 00:54, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
David,
Thanks, I've bookmarked your advice. I do use gdb but I've always
found the macros in common use are the biggest hurdle. In addition
C++ has its own associated difficulties.
Note, in the past working on other compilers I've always tried to hav
David,
Thanks, I've bookmarked your advice. I do use gdb but I've always
found the macros in common use are the biggest hurdle. In addition
C++ has its own associated difficulties.
Note, in the past working on other compilers I've always tried to have
a function version of the macros available.
Snapshot gcc-10-20211203 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20211203/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, 18:58 Dr. Jürgen Sauermann,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I observed
> the following:
>
> Your web page says that "Static assertions" are supported by GCC since
> version 4.3.
>
> Today I tried to use "Static assertions" on an av
Hi,
not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I observed
the following:
Your web page says that "Static assertions" are supported by GCC since
version 4.3.
Today I tried to use "Static assertions" on an avr-g++ resp. avr-gcc
which identifies
itself as:
eedjsa@server68:
Hi!
On 12/3/21 5:56 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
>> Note, we want to test both building gcc on ppc64le with older glibc
>> and newer glibc (and that libgfortran will have the same ABI between both
>> and one can move gcc including libgfortran and libquadmath from the older
>> glibc set
Hi Jakub,
Note, we want to test both building gcc on ppc64le with older glibc
and newer glibc (and that libgfortran will have the same ABI between both
and one can move gcc including libgfortran and libquadmath from the older
glibc setup to newer and make -mabi=ieeelongdouble work in Fortran t
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:16:56PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> > It is part of upstream glibc 2.32 (released Aug 2020) and later, see
> > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=051be01f6b41a1466b07ae4bd7f5894a8ec5fe67
> > distrowatch says that glibc 2.32 and later is in Ubuntu 21.04 a
On 03.12.21 10:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:29:53AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
On 01.12.21 21:54, Jakub Jelinek via Fortran wrote:
Inside of libgfortran, I think it should depend on some macro defined
in libgfortran.h.
#if defined(__powerpc64__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ ==
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:29:53AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> On 01.12.21 21:54, Jakub Jelinek via Fortran wrote:
>
> > Inside of libgfortran, I think it should depend on some macro defined
> > in libgfortran.h.
> > #if defined(__powerpc64__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ \
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
