This attribute controls optimizations which make assumptions about the
semantics of builtin functions. Typical cases here are code which
match memcpy, calloc, sincos, or which call builtins like free.
This extends on things like the -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns
flag. That flag only covers conve
Richard Biener writes:
> I don't think it reliably works the way you implement it. It's also having
> more side-effects than what you document, in particular
Yeah, I made a 'minimal' patch that had the effect I needed, but it's
clearly in the wrong place as it disables the matching of builtins
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:56:33AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Would starting from Advance Toolchain 15 with the most recent glibc make
> things easier for Thomas to test?
The problem is gcc135 runs Centos 7.x which is not compatible with AT 13-15.
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Mas
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:18 PM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/31/2021 6:12 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > After Jeff's explanation of the symbiosis between jump threading and
> > the uninit pass, I'm beginning to see that (almost) every
> > Wuninitialized warning is cause for reflection. It
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 11:13 AM Keith Packard via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> This option (enabled by default) controls optimizations which convert
> a sequence of operations into an equivalent sequence that includes
> calls to builtin functions. Typical cases here are code which matches
> memcpy, cal
Hi,
I am looking at tree-ssa-structalias.c looking at what makes a
function nonlocal during IPA-PTA. I am having some problems
understanding force_output and when it is set or unset.
1. What is the meaning of force_output? cgraph.h gives an example that
force output means that the symbol might be
Please don't cross-post to the gcc and gcc-help lists. Either you are
asking about GCC development of asking about using it, not both. Pick one
list.
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021, 04:22 sotrdg sotrdg via Gcc-help,
wrote:
> It looks like It is still in early phase. the fmodule-ts still emits dead
> code fo