Snapshot gcc-11-20210717 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20210717/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On July 17, 2021 8:54:38 PM GMT+02:00, Stefan Kanthak
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>GCC 10.2.0 (and GCC 8.3; other versions and targets except i386 and
>amd64 not tested) generate rather bad code for the following ternary
>expression:
>
>--- repro.c ---
>#define NULL (char *) 0
>
>char *dummy(char *string, long
Hi,
GCC 10.2.0 (and GCC 8.3; other versions and targets except i386 and
amd64 not tested) generate rather bad code for the following ternary
expression:
--- repro.c ---
#define NULL (char *) 0
char *dummy(char *string, long count) {
return count == 0 ? NULL : string + 1;
}
--- EOF ---
$ gcc
On 16.07.21 20:22, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
So it seems to me rather surprising to take the position that we should
not be committing any new test cases that need to be XFAILed
It is what I was told in no uncertain terms some years ago, which
is where my current state of knowledge comes from.
S
