On 6/15/21 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/14/2021 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I bet it's going to be tougher to remove DOM's threader. It knows how
to do thinks like resolve memory references using temporary equivalences
and such. But I bet it's enough to drop the VRP based threaders
On 6/14/2021 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I bet it's going to be tougher to remove DOM's threader. It knows how
to do thinks like resolve memory references using temporary equivalences
and such. But I bet it's enough to drop the VRP based threaders.
Yes. In fact I am wondering if addi
Yeah, create_llvm_prof depends on llvm_symbolizer which shouldn't have the
same limitation. To separate from llvm, create_gcov still depends on the
old set of addr2line library which likely doesn't support dwarf v5. That is
an issue indeed.
Thanks,
Wei.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:14 PM Eugene Roze
Patches need go to gcc-patches@ not gcc@ (and libstdc++ patches need
to be CC'd to libstdc++@ as well).
Hi John,
But they did offer some tentative support for my second suggestion of changing the meaning of bare
"netbsd" --- "netbsdaout" would still be available to unambiguously request
a.out for anyone that wants it.
I think that this would be OK for the binutils, providing that when configur
