>Of course, that would require coming up with a new name for the one
>being migrated from Freenode, so that it doesn't clash with the
>existing GCC channel on OFTC
For consistency with the mailing lists, #gcc-help seems like an
obvious choice (if we do want to move it to OFTC rather than
libera.ch
Recently I have noticed a post going around various FOSS circles about
Freenode changing hands:
https://gist.github.com/joepie91/df80d8d36cd9d1bde46ba018af497409
I also checked the GCC wiki, and on both its main page and its
GCConIRC page it advertises an IRC channel on Freenode for GCC:
https://gc
Hi all,
There is an agenda for tomorrow's meeting. If you have topics to
discuss or share, please let me know and I can add them to the agenda.
## Agenda:
1. Document ELF attribute section
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/71
2. Calling conventions for the lazily bound functi
Hi Nathan:
Recently I am clean up the failed case for bare-matel riscv64 target,
and that not support omp due to lack of pthread support (e.g.
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/omp-1_a), however even I add
`dg-require-effective-target pthread`, `dg-module-cmi` seems still try
to test and then get faile
On Wed, 19 May 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 9.4 is available from
>
> https://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.4.0-RC-20210519/
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
> 8091c46cf736124a106922ddfd1fdb99
The first release candidate for GCC 9.4 is available from
https://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.4.0-RC-20210519/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
8091c46cf736124a106922ddfd1fdb99f33b0241.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate
on
Status
==
The GCC 9 branch is now frozen for the upcoming GCC 9.4 release.
I will announce a first release candidate shortly.
All changes require release manager approval now.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- --
