Hi!
Thanks, Michael, and again Richard for your quick responses.
On 2021-03-16T15:25:10+, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
>> >>Indeed, given (Fortran) 'zzz = 1', we produce GIMPLE:
>> >>
>> >>gimple_assign
>> >>
>> >>..., and calling 'walk_stmt_load_s
Hello,
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >>Indeed, given (Fortran) 'zzz = 1', we produce GIMPLE:
> >>
> >>gimple_assign
> >>
> >>..., and calling 'walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops' on that, I see, as
> >>expected, the 'visit_store' callback invoked, with 'rhs' and 'arg':
> >>''.
> >
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Richard, thanks for your answer. I'll need to look into this more; two
> questions already:
>
> On 2021-03-15T20:17:17+0100, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > On March 15, 2021 7:31:46 PM GMT+01:00, Thomas Schwinge
> > wrote:
>
Hi!
Richard, thanks for your answer. I'll need to look into this more; two
questions already:
On 2021-03-15T20:17:17+0100, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> On March 15, 2021 7:31:46 PM GMT+01:00, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
>>First time I'm using this API -- so the error certainly may be on my
>>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:16 PM Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently working on improving my understanding of the implementation
> of the intraprocedural points-to analysis in GCC. I have already read the
> papers by Daniel Berlin and have been looking at the source for some tim
Hello,
I'm currently working on improving my understanding of the implementation
of the intraprocedural points-to analysis in GCC. I have already read the
papers by Daniel Berlin and have been looking at the source for some time,
but I understand that those references are a little bit old and migh
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 10:47, Rene Kita wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:26:29AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
> > > % gcc -Wall -Wpedantic main.c
> > > main.c: In function 'main':
> > > main.c:10:16: warning: format '%hn' expects a
Status
==
GCC trunk which eventually will become GCC 11 is still in
regression and documentation fixes only mode (Stage 4).
If history should repeat itself then a first release candidate
of GCC 11 will be released mid April. For this to happen
we need to resolve the remaining 17 P1 regress
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:26:29AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
> > % gcc -Wall -Wpedantic main.c
> > main.c: In function 'main':
> > main.c:10:16: warning: format '%hn' expects argument of type 'short int *',
> > but argument 2 has type
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
> (Please keep me CC'd, I'm not subscribe to the list)
>
> Here is a minimal example:
> #include
>
> int
> main()
> {
> unsigned short n;
> unsigned short *p;
> p = &n;
>
> printf("p: %hn\n", p);
> }
>
>
> % gcc -Wall -Wpedant
(Please keep me CC'd, I'm not subscribe to the list)
Here is a minimal example:
#include
int
main()
{
unsigned short n;
unsigned short *p;
p = &n;
printf("p: %hn\n", p);
}
% gcc -Wall -Wpedantic main.c
main.c: In function 'main':
main.c:10:16: warning: format '%hn' expects argument of
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, 08:53 Martin Liška, wrote:
> On 3/16/21 3:39 AM, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information
> that is confidential and proprietary t
On 3/16/21 3:39 AM, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
Guys,
I checked out a fresh copy of the GCC sources today, applied somebodies
patch to it and voila!
options.c:13591:2: error: #error Report option property is dropped #error
Report option property is dropped
I built this the same minimally convo
Hi Gary,
the options.c file is generated from the gcc/common.opt file. Report was a
keyword that could be given to optimization options but which was dropped
sometime in December I think. The patches I sent you should have the
keyword Report dropped. Are you applying your sources already? If not,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:41 PM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I checked out a fresh copy of the GCC sources today, applied somebodies
> patch to it and voila!
>
> options.c:13591:2: error: #error Report option property is dropped #error
> Report option property is dropped
>
> I built t
15 matches
Mail list logo
