On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:04 PM Alexander Yermolovich
wrote:
>
>
> --
> *From:* David Blaikie
> *Sent:* Monday, November 30, 2020 12:09 PM
> *To:* Alexander Yermolovich
> *Cc:* Richard Biener ; Jakub Jelinek <
> ja...@redhat.com>; Mark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:41 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22:34PM +, Bill Messmer wrote:
>
> > I'm still a bit confused here. And the reason I ask this is because
> > I open this particular vmlinux image with an OSS ELF/DWARF
> > library... which gives
Mark,
Thank you very much for the help. I was so fixated on the fact that the
.rela.debug* sections were there that I didn't pay attention to the e_type in
the ELF header. Apparently, neither did the library that I was using to parse
the DWARF data.
Interestingly, I have seen other non-RedHa
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> For the test mentioned in PR, I was trying to see if we could do
> specialized expansion for vcond in target when operands are -1 and 0.
> arm_expand_vcond gets the following operands:
> (reg:V8QI 113 [ _2 ])
> (reg:V8QI 117)
> (reg:V8QI 118)
Hi,
For the test mentioned in PR, I was trying to see if we could do
specialized expansion for vcond in target when operands are -1 and 0.
arm_expand_vcond gets the following operands:
(reg:V8QI 113 [ _2 ])
(reg:V8QI 117)
(reg:V8QI 118)
(lt (reg/v:V8QI 115 [ a ])
(reg/v:V8QI 116 [ b ]))
(reg/v:
