Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

2020-07-09 Thread Bill Schmidt via Gcc
On 7/9/20 12:13 PM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: On July 9, 2020 3:43:19 PM GMT+02:00, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM Matthias Klose wrote: On 7/9/20 1:58 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose wrote: https://gcc.gnu

gcc-8-20200709 is now available

2020-07-09 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-8-20200709 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200709/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: Future debug options: -f* or -g*?

2020-07-09 Thread David Blaikie via Gcc
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:03 PM Fangrui Song wrote: > > Both GCC and Clang have implemented many debugging options under -f and > -g. Whether options go to -f or -g appears to be pretty arbitrary decisions. > > A non-complete list of GCC supported debug options is documented here at > https://gcc.

Re: Future debug options: -f* or -g*?

2020-07-09 Thread Fangrui Song via Gcc
Fix email addresses:) On 2020-07-09, Fangrui Song wrote: Both GCC and Clang have implemented many debugging options under -f and -g. Whether options go to -f or -g appears to be pretty arbitrary decisions. A non-complete list of GCC supported debug options is documented here at https://gcc.gnu.

Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

2020-07-09 Thread Florian Weimer via Gcc
* David Edelsohn via Gcc: > No, it's not dropped. Some people are being pedantic about the name, > which is why Bill added {,le}. powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu means > everything. If you want to add {,le} back, that's fine. But there > always is some variant omitted, and that doesn't mean it is

Future debug options: -f* or -g*?

2020-07-09 Thread Fangrui Song via Gcc
Both GCC and Clang have implemented many debugging options under -f and -g. Whether options go to -f or -g appears to be pretty arbitrary decisions. A non-complete list of GCC supported debug options is documented here at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html I think there op

Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

2020-07-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On July 9, 2020 3:43:19 PM GMT+02:00, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: >On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM Matthias Klose wrote: >> >> On 7/9/20 1:58 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose >wrote: >> >> >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html lists t

Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

2020-07-09 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 7/9/20 1:58 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > >> > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html lists the little endian platform > >> first > >> as a primary target, however it's

Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

2020-07-09 Thread Matthias Klose
On 7/9/20 1:58 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose wrote: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html lists the little endian platform >> first >> as a primary target, however it's not mentioned for GCC 9 and GCC 10. Just an >> omission? >> >> https

Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

2020-07-09 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html lists the little endian platform first > as a primary target, however it's not mentioned for GCC 9 and GCC 10. Just an > omission? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg00854.html su

documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

2020-07-09 Thread Matthias Klose
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html lists the little endian platform first as a primary target, however it's not mentioned for GCC 9 and GCC 10. Just an omission? https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg00854.html suggests that the little endian platform should be mentioned, and m

GNU Tools @ Linux Plumbers Conference 2020

2020-07-09 Thread Jeremy Bennett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, As you know, we have been unable to hold GNU Tools Cauldron this year due to COVID-19. We plan to be back in 2021! In the meantime, our friends at the Linux Plumbers Conference have provided a GNU Tools track at their 2020 virtual conference

Re: Split generated insn-emit.c

2020-07-09 Thread Jojo R
Hi Martin, > I tried to investigate a bit: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402 Looks like you have done some experiments for splitting hug files ? I can not find any patch, could you share much more idea with it ? —Jojo 在 2020年7月9日 +0800 PM3:59，Martin Liška ，写道： > On 7/9/20 9:54

Re: Split generated insn-emit.c

2020-07-09 Thread Martin Liška
On 7/9/20 9:54 AM, jiejie_r...@c-sky.com wrote: Hi, The size of generated file like insn-emit.c is very huge if we add lots of define_expand patten or define_insn patten. It’s present easily when there are much more intrinsic interfaces it costs much more time to

Split generated insn-emit.c

2020-07-09 Thread jiejie_rong
Hi, The size of generated file like insn-emit.c is very huge if we add lots of define_expand patten or define_insn patten. It’s present easily when there are much more intrinsic interfaces it costs much more time to create toolchain with compiling these files :(