At IPA time I'm creating GIMPLE statements. I've noticed during dumps
that gotos and labels don't seem to exist. In fact when I tried
introducing them, at least the gotos, failed. I assume that at this
point in compilation GCC relies on the control flow graph (which I'm
updating as I create new BB
Hi,
I am attaching here the first report of the
"Automatic Parallel Viability" project. Please feel free to suggest
improvements to the project.
The content below is presented in markdown format, and you can easily
convert it to PDF with pandoc if you feel it uncomfortable to read in
current form
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:12 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> > > > per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> > > > I have some questions on defining or at least using so
Snapshot gcc-8-20200702 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200702/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:40 PM wrote:
> GCC seems to overlap register bewteen DEST and SOURCE in different
> machine mode,
> Is there any target hooks to control this feature ?
> I use ‘&’ to forbid register allocator to
> overlap bewteen DEST and SOURCE,
> but t
Martin,
What about immediate dominators?
Thanks,
Gary
From: Martin Jambor
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 3:40 PM
To: Gary Oblock ; Richard Biener
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: An problematic interaction between a call created by
gimple_build_call and inli
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> > > per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> > > I have some questions on defining or at least using some of the data
> > types.
> >
> > The standard makes those inte
Hello,
Thank you for the detailed reply. I have some questions.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:47 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> > per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> > I have some questions on defining or at least using some of th
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> I have some questions on defining or at least using some of the data types.
The standard makes those intentionally not defined, it is up to the
implementation to put in there whatever is
The release of GNU MPFR 4.1.0 ("épinards à la crème") is imminent.
Please help to make this release as good as possible by downloading
and testing this release candidate:
https://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-4.1.0/mpfr-4.1.0-rc2.tar.xz
https://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-4.1.0/mpfr-4.1.0-rc2.tar.bz2
https://www.mpfr.o
On 7/2/20 8:12 AM, Harshit Sharma wrote:
Thanks Martin. I liked your idea of using
__builtin___asan_version_mismatch_check_v8().
But now, I am getting a compile error. ( error: implicit declaration of
function '__builtin___asan_version_mismatch_check_v8'; )
It means the reference to this funct
11 matches
Mail list logo
