Re: Support for named address spaces in C++

2020-06-03 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:32 PM Max Ruttenberg via Gcc wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’ve added a named address space to our backend and I noticed that it is only > support in C. > Has anyone had experience porting this feature to C++? Is there any technical > reason why it’s not supported? The main is

Support for named address spaces in C++

2020-06-03 Thread Max Ruttenberg via Gcc
Hi all, I’ve added a named address space to our backend and I noticed that it is only support in C. Has anyone had experience porting this feature to C++? Is there any technical reason why it’s not supported? Thank you, Max

Re: Stepping down as x86 vector ISA maintainer

2020-06-03 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:25 AM Uros Bizjak wrote: > > I would like to inform GCC community, that I decided to step down from > maintaining x86 vector ISA part. x86 vector ISA has its own > non-responsive maintainer, but I have filled the maintainers role > nevertheless, until gcc-10 was released.

Re: [PATCH 2/5] gthr-vxworks.h: fix leftover _VXW_PRE_69

2020-06-03 Thread Olivier Hainque
> On 26 May 2020, at 16:52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > _VXW_PRE_69 was introduced in 806dd0472f, then replaced by > _VXWORKS_PRE(6,9) in abb6c3eecf, but this one was missed. > > Fixes: abb6c3eecf (Introduce an internal API for VxWorks version checks) > --- > libgcc/config/gthr-vxworks.h | 2 +

Re: [PATCH 0/5] some vxworks patches

2020-06-03 Thread Olivier Hainque
Hi Rasmus, > On 26 May 2020, at 16:52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > Hi Olivier et al > > I'm having quite a bit of trouble getting gcc 10 to build for our > vxworks 5 (5.5.1) target. The first thing I hit is > > #if !defined(_WRS_VXWORKS_MAJOR) > #error "VxWorks version macros needed but not de

Re: Stepping down as x86 vector ISA maintainer

2020-06-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 09:25:35AM +0200, Uros Bizjak via Gcc wrote: > I would like to inform GCC community, that I decided to step down from > maintaining x86 vector ISA part. x86 vector ISA has its own > non-responsive maintainer, but I have filled the maintainers role > nevertheless, until gcc-1

Re: Stepping down as x86 vector ISA maintainer

2020-06-03 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020, Uros Bizjak wrote: > I would like to inform GCC community, that I decided to step down from > maintaining x86 vector ISA part. x86 vector ISA has its own > non-responsive maintainer, but I have filled the maintainers role > nevertheless, until gcc-10 was released. > > Unfortun

Stepping down as x86 vector ISA maintainer

2020-06-03 Thread Uros Bizjak via Gcc
I would like to inform GCC community, that I decided to step down from maintaining x86 vector ISA part. x86 vector ISA has its own non-responsive maintainer, but I have filled the maintainers role nevertheless, until gcc-10 was released. Unfortunately, maintaining the whole x86 target has been too