Snapshot gcc-10-20200509 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20200509/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 09:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> On 5/9/20 10:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > If you mean for PR reasons or good apeparances, no. But it's wrong to
> > have bugs left open that only refer to unsupported versions of GCC. If
> > none of the supported releases has t
On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 19:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> On 5/9/20 12:31 PM, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> > I'd also like to nominate the following two:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
> >
> > which I also cannot
On 5/9/20 12:31 PM, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> I'd also like to nominate the following two:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
>
> which I also cannot close myself. There won't be any further revisions of this
> list by me.
Th
> Otherwise, I'm proposing to finally close all open PRs filed against
> powerpcspe. I've been able to identify the following ones:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19490
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30259
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37759
> http
> Strangely, I failed to find any PR for e200, so maybe some unnoticed ones
> are still lying around.
I think that the e200 support was never contributed upstream.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 5/9/20 10:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> If you mean for PR reasons or good apeparances, no. But it's wrong to
> have bugs left open that only refer to unsupported versions of GCC. If
> none of the supported releases has the bug (either because it's been
> fixed, or the relevant code has been r
On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 08:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 5/9/20 12:15 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > I can do both, if you want, or just the first group? Your choice.
> >
> > But let's hear other opinions first.
>
> These bugs document the current issues with the backend as
