Re: [PATCH] Weird Linker Error

2020-02-28 Thread Nicholas Krause
Please forgetĀ  this email seems it was a dumb typo. Nick On 2/28/20 5:44 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote: From: Nicholas Krause Greetings, Sorry if this is a dumb question but I'm not sure if this is a linker error due to not linking pthreads or something else going on. I'm assuming its something

gcc-8-20200228 is now available

2020-02-28 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-8-20200228 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200228/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

SSA Operands Locking

2020-02-28 Thread Nicholas Krause
Greetings, After looking through the manual there seem to be a number of for iterating marcos related to PHI or SSA nodes. Since iterating through nodes is shared state I was wondering whether we should lock internal to the marco itself around the iteration or around each caller of one of thes

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

2020-02-28 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 17:37 +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Recently Honza, me and others discussed LTO's interaction with > > build systems, and that perhaps the module mapper could be > > generalized for other purposes. (Yes, still need to resurrect my > > Make PoC) > > see also the "Create a g

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

2020-02-28 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Fri, Feb 28 2020, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 2/27/20 12:04 PM, Paul Smith wrote: >> On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 16:58 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: That's a problem then as were assuming a user's build system for this to work. I mean for now its fine but in the future wouldn't it de a >

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

2020-02-28 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 2/27/20 12:04 PM, Paul Smith wrote: On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 16:58 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: That's a problem then as were assuming a user's build system for this to work. I mean for now its fine but in the future wouldn't it de a good ideal to not assume this? It works fine for everybody.

Re: GCC 9.3 Status Report (2020-02-28)

2020-02-28 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:42 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Status > == > > GCC 9.2 has been released more than half a year ago and it is time > for another release from the latest stable branch. Many people have > backported their fixes to 9 branch recently already, often together > with backpo

Effective and cheapest solution to prevent viro- and bacterial spreading

2020-02-28 Thread Coronacover.com
Effective and cheapest solution to prevent viro- and bacterial exposure https://sendy.shieldingsystems.eu/l/ppJLEU0d9F0P763nlkvcZCsQ/P7qvK8922w0M8926QLLHGVF7763A/x763RAAptID1W4sz3nMR1X892w Anti Microbial copper You may change your email preferences or https://sendy.shieldingsystems.eu/unsubscri

GCC 9.3 Status Report (2020-02-28)

2020-02-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == GCC 9.2 has been released more than half a year ago and it is time for another release from the latest stable branch. Many people have backported their fixes to 9 branch recently already, often together with backports for 8.4. Now that 8.4-rc1 is out, I'd like to do a 9.3-rc1 on Th

Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-02-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 28/02/20 19:34 +1300, maticulous wrote: I can assure you that the website @gnu.org or any domains associated with gnu.org are not for sale. If you want to negotiate you should probably contact GNU directly. They're not trying to buy the domain, they're asking what we charge for somebody to p