Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

I can assure you that the website @gnu.org or any domains associated with gnu.org are not for sale. If you want to negotiate you should probably contact GNU directly. Good luck. On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:00 PM Alfie blake wrote: > Hi any update > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:30, Alfie blake > w

MLIR Dialects for Multi-Threading GCC

Greetings All, Seems the LLVM side has made a multi threaded pass manager in MLIR: https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/WritingAPass/ It also seems to have fixed a lot of the issues around my research in SSA. There are two ways to look into using MLIR either: a) Write a dialect of it for GIMPLE b) Use th

Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

Hi any update On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:30, Alfie blake wrote: > Hi sir, > Please tell me price, > I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020

Re: GSoC: some questions about the static analyzer pass

On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 09:31 +0800, y...@bupt.edu.cn wrote: > Hello everybody! I've learned about the projects in Google summer of > code, and I'm so interested in the static analyzer pass. I wonder > that where I can read the code of the static analyzer pass and how to > contact with the mental Dav

GSoC: some questions about the static analyzer pass

Hello everybody! I've learned about the projects in Google summer of code, and I'm so interested in the static analyzer pass. I wonder that where I can read the code of the static analyzer pass and how to contact with the mental David Malcolm. Can anyone help me please? Thank you so much. y..

Re: Discussion on Removal of Garbage Collector and other GCC Multi threaded Work

On 2/27/20 3:02 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 14:07 -0500, Nicholas Krause wrote: Greetings All, After doing some more research it seems that it may be time to remove the garbage collector. I'm aware of the linkage to precompiled headers but even them I think its time due to

Re: GCC 8.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

I bootstrapped and tested on power 7 and power 8 BE and on power 8 and power 9 LE and saw nothing untoward. On 2/26/20 4:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The first release candidate for GCC 8.4 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.4.0-RC-20200226/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/

Re: Discussion on Removal of Garbage Collector and other GCC Multi threaded Work

On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 14:07 -0500, Nicholas Krause wrote: > Greetings All, > > After doing some more research it seems that it may be time to > remove > the garbage collector. I'm > aware of the linkage to precompiled headers but even them I think > its > time due to two reasons: > > 1. The wor

Discussion on Removal of Garbage Collector and other GCC Multi threaded Work

Greetings All, After doing some more research it seems that it may be time to remove the garbage collector. I'm aware of the linkage to precompiled headers but even them I think its time due to two reasons: 1. The work related to multithreading gcc is working around the global state of the c

Re: Help implementing support for vec in gengtype

On 2/27/20 12:56 PM, Giuliano Belinassi wrote: Hi, all. I am tying to fix an issue with a global variable in the parallel gcc project. For this, I am trying to move some global variables from tree-ssa-operands to struct function. One of this variable is a vec type, and gengtype doesn't look s

Re: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x

Hi Sebastian, On 2/27/20 4:53 PM, Pop, Sebastian wrote: Hi, is somebody already working on backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 8.x and 9.x branches? I'm not aware of such work going on. Thanks, Kyrill Thanks, Sebastian

Help implementing support for vec in gengtype

Hi, all. I am tying to fix an issue with a global variable in the parallel gcc project. For this, I am trying to move some global variables from tree-ssa-operands to struct function. One of this variable is a vec type, and gengtype doesn't look so happy with it. In this context, I am trying to ad

[AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x

Hi, is somebody already working on backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 8.x and 9.x branches? Thanks, Sebastian

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 16:58 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > That's a problem then as were assuming a user's build system for this > > to work. I mean for now its fine but in the future wouldn't it de a > > good ideal to not assume this? > > It works fine for everybody. There's just an optimisati

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 16:18, Nicholas Krause wrote: > > > > On 2/27/20 3:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 06:50, Nicholas Krause wrote: > >> Greetings Martin, > >> > >> This patch: > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff;f=gcc/lto-wrapper.c;h=353187c60434f43a44

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

On 2/27/20 3:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 06:50, Nicholas Krause wrote: Greetings Martin, This patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff;f=gcc/lto-wrapper.c;h=353187c60434f43a445e708dcfbf53c857f8cdc1;hp=946897726d03716f7c93f955c438ee4f8190044c;hb=f12fbeb53

Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions

On 2/3/20 6:41 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 22/01/2020 17:45, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: [updated based on v2 discussions] This patch proposes some new (additional) rules for email subject lines when contributing to GCC.  The goal is to make sure that, as far as possible, the su

Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

Hi sir, Please tell me price, I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:22, Alfie blake wrote: > > *Hi Sir,What is the post price of this si

what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

*Hi Sir,What is the post price of this site?* https://gcc.gnu.org/ *Tell me price of,* *Existing Post Link?* *Normal Post?Casino Post?waiting for your reply.*

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 06:50, Nicholas Krause wrote: > > Greetings Martin, > > This patch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff;f=gcc/lto-wrapper.c;h=353187c60434f43a445e708dcfbf53c857f8cdc1;hp=946897726d03716f7c93f955c438ee4f8190044c;hb=f12fbeb535f192f742025cc4f9b69a48136730f1;hpb=80c7

Re: Binaries page modifications

On 27/02/20 08:23 +, CHIGOT, CLEMENT wrote: Hi everyone, I'm one of the owner of the BullFreeware website and I'm seeing that, in https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html, our website is described for "Bull’s Open Source Software Archive for for AIX 5L and AIX 6;". Would it be possible to

Binaries page modifications

Hi everyone, I'm one of the owner of the BullFreeware website and I'm seeing that, in https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html, our website is described for "Bull’s Open Source Software Archive for for AIX 5L and AIX 6;". Would it be possible to change it for "Bull’s Open Source Software Archi