On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:08:25AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> With Git you can't really have unwanted local commits present in a
> tree if you use a sensible workflow, so if you tested in a tree that
> was at commit 1234abcd and you push from another machine that is at
> the same commit, you k
Snapshot gcc-8-20200207 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200207/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
> "Jason" == Jason Merrill writes:
Jason> I omit ChangeLogs by adding ':!*/ChangeLog' to the end of the git
Jason> send-email command. I don't remember where I found that incantation.
Cool, I did not know about this.
FWIW if you have the ChangeLog merger available, it's actually more
conve
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 1:44 PM Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> > "Jonathan" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
> Jonathan> I have a script that does the opposite, which I've been using for
> Jonathan> years. I edit the ChangeLog files as before, and a Git
> Jonathan> prepare-commit-msg hook extracts the top
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
Jonathan> I have a script that does the opposite, which I've been using for
Jonathan> years. I edit the ChangeLog files as before, and a Git
Jonathan> prepare-commit-msg hook extracts the top changelog entry from each
Jonathan> file in the commit and pr
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:43:05PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 07/02/2020 15:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:56:08PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >>Any script should, in addition to extracting the author and email also
> >>grep for "Co-authore
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:41:25PM +0100, m wrote:
> ...so I tried to write a corresponding matching pattern, like so:
>
> (define_insn "smulhshi3"
> [(set (match_operand:HI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> (truncate:HI
> (ashiftrt:SI
> (mult:SI
> (sign_e
On 07/02/2020 15:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:56:08PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/02/2020 13:48, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Should we require some simple markup in the commit message before the
changelogs? Maybe
CL gcc/
* blablalba etc.
CL g
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:56:08PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 07/02/2020 13:48, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >Should we require some simple markup in the commit message before the
> >changelogs? Maybe
> >
> >CL gcc/
> > * blablalba etc.
> >CL gcc/testsuite/
> > * gcc.target
Hello!
I am trying to implement the following insns for my back end: smulhssi3,
smulhshi3, smulhsqi3
According to [1], the operation should be equivalent to:
narrow op0, op1, op2;
op0 = (narrow) (((wide) op1 * (wide) op2) >> (N / 2 - 1));
...so I tried to write a corresponding matching p
On 07/02/2020 13:48, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:19:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:25 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
Yeah, don't look at me then :-)
I *like* having most of those steps, most of this should only be done by
people who are
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:19:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:25 PM Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> > Yeah, don't look at me then :-)
> >
> > I *like* having most of those steps, most of this should only be done by
> > people who are awake.
> >
> > > it's definitel
;s easier to not realise
exactly what you're testing, it's harder to verify that what you
tested is what you eventually pushed).
Applying somebody else's patch to test it can be done in a local
branch and committed locally. You can always delete that branch later
to clear up (a na
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:25 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:01:20PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:51 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> > > If you rebase changelog files, then yes, it's a bloody pain ;-)
> >
> > So do you have a script that
14 matches
Mail list logo
